| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 1 | 06 (74%) | 50 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 3134 | 8 |
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CT | 5 | 05 (99%) | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 33 | 5 | 37 | 7 | 1228 | 5 |
| FL | 15 | 49 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 5 | 2056 | 7 | |
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| KS | 3 | 03 (92%) | 53 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 1711 | 6 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| MI | 3 | 02 (50%) | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 1930 | 6 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 | |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 7 | 07 (72%) | 46 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 1071 | 5 |
| NY | 18 | 18 (70%) | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 34 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 836 | 4 |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| OH | 13 | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1890 | 6 | |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| PA | 1 | 01 (93%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 42 | 8 | 1681 | 6 |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| VA | 2 | 02 (65%) | 54 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 39 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1363 | 5 |
| VA | 7 | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 46 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 1036 | 5 | |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| WI | 1 | 01 (85%) | 52 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 1174 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 40 | 45 (64%) | 61 | 47 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 48 | 8 | 49 | 10 | 4390 | 8 |
| CA | 45 | 66 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 72 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 8207 | 10 | |
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| FL | 27 | 27 (82%) | 61 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 83 | 10 | 39 | 8 | 9355 | 10 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| NE | 2 | 02 (97%) | 58 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 28 | 4 | 40 | 8 | 2541 | 7 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| NY | 3 | 03 (64%) | 65 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 42 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 6713 | 9 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 6 | 02 (69%) | 42 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 36 | 7 | 821 | 4 |
| MN | 1 | 01 (90%) | 37 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 214 | 1 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| MT | 1 | 00 (100%) | 43 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 128 | 1 |
| NJ | 2 | 02 (90%) | 42 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 891 | 4 |
| NY | 19 | 43 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 18 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 286 | 2 | |
| PA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 41 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 22 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 715 | 4 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 19 | 54 | 69 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 48 | 8 | 44 | 9 | 2303 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CO | 2 | 02 (78%) | 51 | 68 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 56 | 10 | 945 | 5 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| MD | 6 | 06 (89%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 1042 | 5 |
| MI | 6 | 12 (57%) | 55 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 28 | 4 | 50 | 10 | 1839 | 6 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| NJ | 1 | 01 (95%) | 54 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 3026 | 7 |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| NJ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 39 | 6 | 51 | 10 | 2656 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| NM | 1 | 01 (74%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 51 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 1672 | 6 |
| NM | 2 | 02 (73%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 364 | 2 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 4 | 04 (83%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 58 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 2417 | 7 |
| NY | 20 | 20 (88%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 40 | 8 | 1559 | 6 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 49 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 3137 | 8 |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 23 | 08 (85%) | 46 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 806 | 4 |
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 7 | 07 (62%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1877 | 6 |
| FL | 16 | 16 (80%) | 47 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 1969 | 7 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| FL | 21 | 18 (98%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 32 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1723 | 6 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| IN | 5 | 05 (75%) | 48 | 41 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 17 | 2 | 38 | 8 | 962 | 5 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| MD | 1 | 01 (60%) | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 654 | 4 |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| MO | 2 | 02 (71%) | 49 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 14 | 2 | 47 | 9 | 1452 | 6 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| NE | 1 | 01 (89%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 1017 | 5 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| SC | 2 | 02 (96%) | 49 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 33 | 6 | 642 | 3 |
| TX | 2 | 48 | 36 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 1887 | 6 | |
| TX | 3 | 03 (76%) | 48 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 1833 | 6 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 22 | 22 (75%) | 49 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 55 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 1362 | 5 |
| TX | 26 | 26 (74%) | 45 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 40 | 6 | 43 | 9 | 1462 | 6 |
| UT | 4 | 04 (83%) | 45 | 30 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 2218 | 7 |
| VA | 1 | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 780 | 4 | |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| WI | 6 | 06 (97%) | 46 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 7 | 03 (73%) | 50 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 1633 | 6 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CA | 13 | 16 (53%) | 49 | 55 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 74 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1174 | 5 |
| CA | 25 | 36 (72%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 72 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 1538 | 6 |
| FL | 9 | 09 (71%) | 50 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 1843 | 6 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| NM | 3 | 03 (81%) | 47 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 62 | 9 | 24 | 3 | 119 | 1 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| PA | 17 | 17 (94%) | 50 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 16 | 2 | 41 | 8 | 1487 | 6 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 34 | 34 (75%) | 50 | 62 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 90 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 1373 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 31 | 6 | 564 | 3 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| FL | 4 | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 45 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1203 | 5 | |
| FL | 13 | 13 (70%) | 50 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 3817 | 8 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NY | 11 | 11 (87%) | 66 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 46 | 7 | 36 | 7 | 19506 | 10 |
| OH | 8 | 08 (64%) | 50 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 29 | 5 | 1280 | 5 |
| OH | 10 | 10 (90%) | 54 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 26 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1725 | 6 |
| OH | 15 | 52 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1442 | 5 | |
| SC | 4 | 04 (97%) | 50 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1041 | 5 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 2 | 02 (93%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 210 | 1 |
| AL | 3 | 03 (96%) | 39 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 195 | 1 |
| AL | 4 | 04 (94%) | 29 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 18 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 140 | 1 |
| AL | 5 | 05 (100%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 32 | 6 | 424 | 3 |
| AL | 6 | 06 (90%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 593 | 3 |
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| AR | 1 | 01 (91%) | 35 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 101 | 1 |
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| AZ | 2 | 01 (66%) | 32 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 23 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| AZ | 9 | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 20 | 1 | 715 | 4 | |
| CA | 1 | 01 (73%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 332 | 2 |
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| CA | 5 | 44 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 921 | 4 | |
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 7 | 06 (56%) | 63 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 4527 | 8 |
| CA | 8 | 64 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 4073 | 8 | |
| CA | 9 | 09 (75%) | 57 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 3261 | 8 |
| CA | 10 | 11 (61%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 53 | 10 | 3109 | 8 |
| CA | 11 | 12 (92%) | 70 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 63 | 10 | 26597 | 10 |
| CA | 12 | 13 (100%) | 72 | 91 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 11703 | 10 |
| CA | 14 | 15 (86%) | 67 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 5491 | 9 |
| CA | 15 | 14 (82%) | 70 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 47 | 9 | 10116 | 10 |
| CA | 16 | 18 (69%) | 66 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 61 | 10 | 5440 | 9 |
| CA | 17 | 17 (90%) | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 77 | 10 | 59 | 10 | 7865 | 9 |
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 24 | 24 (85%) | 56 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 46 | 7 | 37 | 7 | 2496 | 7 |
| CA | 26 | 26 (80%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 3116 | 8 |
| CA | 27 | 25 (80%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 2692 | 7 |
| CA | 28 | 27 (87%) | 67 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 45 | 9 | 6661 | 9 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 30 | 28 (85%) | 67 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 43 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 11776 | 10 |
| CA | 31 | 32 (92%) | 65 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 7881 | 9 |
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 37 | 37 (69%) | 74 | 89 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 17265 | 10 |
| CA | 38 | 38 (63%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 6992 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 43 | 43 (72%) | 74 | 85 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 92 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 13830 | 10 |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| CA | 47 | 48 (63%) | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 7 | 56 | 10 | 6215 | 9 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CA | 51 | 53 (51%) | 64 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 6383 | 9 |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| FL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 42 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 960 | 5 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| FL | 8 | 08 (100%) | 43 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1580 | 6 |
| FL | 10 | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 34 | 7 | 3966 | 8 | |
| FL | 11 | 42 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 985 | 5 | |
| FL | 12 | 12 (55%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 994 | 5 |
| FL | 14 | 14 (67%) | 57 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 36 | 7 | 4041 | 8 |
| FL | 17 | 17 (61%) | 41 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 30 | 5 | 1426 | 5 |
| FL | 18 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 525 | 3 | |
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| FL | 25 | 23 (78%) | 57 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 66 | 9 | 37 | 8 | 4880 | 9 |
| GA | 1 | 01 (97%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 369 | 2 |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 5 | 05 (86%) | 74 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 4065 | 8 |
| GA | 7 | 07 (58%) | 66 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2798 | 7 |
| GA | 8 | 08 (81%) | 37 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 39 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 196 | 1 |
| GA | 9 | 09 (68%) | 32 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 413 | 3 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| GA | 12 | 12 (85%) | 44 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 45 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 263 | 2 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| GA | 14 | 14 (90%) | 35 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 454 | 3 |
| HI | 1 | 01 (100%) | 63 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 37 | 7 | 8541 | 10 |
| HI | 2 | 02 (99%) | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 68 | 9 | 30 | 5 | 808 | 4 |
| ID | 1 | 01 (100%) | 36 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 307 | 2 |
| ID | 2 | 02 (96%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 381 | 2 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| IL | 3 | 69 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 57 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 9512 | 10 | |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| IL | 8 | 08 (66%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 3634 | 8 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| IL | 11 | 59 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 2011 | 7 | |
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| IN | 7 | 07 (74%) | 64 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 33 | 6 | 3268 | 8 |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 2 | 02 (73%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 26 | 4 | 295 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| KY | 2 | 02 (87%) | 36 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 269 | 2 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| KY | 5 | 05 (93%) | 30 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 6 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 3 | 03 (96%) | 62 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 38 | 8 | 1905 | 6 |
| MA | 4 | 04 (89%) | 62 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 19 | 2 | 46 | 9 | 2044 | 7 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| MA | 6 | 06 (96%) | 66 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 20 | 3 | 47 | 9 | 2347 | 7 |
| MA | 7 | 07 (97%) | 82 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 47 | 9 | 19932 | 10 |
| MA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 75 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 4559 | 8 |
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 5 | 05 (92%) | 64 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 1098 | 5 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 2 | 37 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 147 | 1 | |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MI | 11 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 48 | 9 | 2921 | 7 | |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MN | 3 | 03 (94%) | 61 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 49 | 10 | 2102 | 7 |
| MN | 4 | 04 (100%) | 65 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 3319 | 8 |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MO | 3 | 03 (58%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 518 | 3 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 5 | 05 (84%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 2574 | 7 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| MO | 8 | 08 (84%) | 31 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| MS | 1 | 01 (100%) | 33 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 186 | 1 |
| MS | 3 | 03 (91%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 26 | 3 | 160 | 1 |
| MS | 4 | 04 (100%) | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 301 | 2 |
| MT | 2 | 00 (100%) | 42 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 83 | 1 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| NC | 4 | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 42 | 8 | 886 | 4 | |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 8 | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 365 | 2 | |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| NC | 11 | 11 (79%) | 36 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 226 | 1 |
| NC | 12 | 12 (72%) | 67 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 2038 | 7 |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NJ | 6 | 06 (89%) | 63 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 40 | 8 | 5104 | 9 |
| NJ | 8 | 08 (93%) | 69 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 26364 | 10 |
| NJ | 9 | 09 (83%) | 66 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 10010 | 10 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NJ | 12 | 12 (87%) | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 48 | 10 | 2928 | 7 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NY | 4 | 04 (84%) | 68 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 8 | 42 | 9 | 8189 | 9 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 6 | 06 (81%) | 72 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 75 | 10 | 37 | 8 | 42610 | 10 |
| NY | 7 | 71 | 84 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 53502 | 10 | |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| NY | 10 | 71 | 87 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 59 | 10 | 66619 | 10 | |
| NY | 12 | 12 (60%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 79 | 10 | 102616 | 10 |
| NY | 13 | 13 (89%) | 78 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 33 | 6 | 97549 | 10 |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| NY | 15 | 15 (64%) | 79 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 65351 | 10 |
| NY | 16 | 16 (75%) | 72 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 10107 | 10 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| NY | 25 | 25 (94%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2171 | 7 |
| NY | 26 | 26 (89%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 3694 | 8 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| OH | 3 | 03 (67%) | 69 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 43 | 9 | 4662 | 9 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 6 | 06 (55%) | 39 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 456 | 3 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| OK | 1 | 01 (96%) | 44 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1685 | 6 |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| OK | 3 | 03 (74%) | 27 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 183 | 1 |
| OK | 4 | 04 (97%) | 34 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| OK | 5 | 05 (79%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 1069 | 5 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| OR | 6 | 05 (58%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 34 | 6 | 1910 | 6 |
| PA | 2 | 02 (96%) | 72 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 25 | 3 | 15355 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 11 | 11 (97%) | 40 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 888 | 4 |
| PA | 12 | 18 (86%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 38 | 8 | 3147 | 8 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| SC | 3 | 03 (95%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 26 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 245 | 2 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| SC | 7 | 07 (99%) | 40 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 312 | 2 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| TN | 2 | 02 (95%) | 41 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 700 | 4 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| TN | 4 | 04 (83%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 280 | 2 |
| TN | 6 | 06 (72%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 344 | 2 |
| TN | 7 | 07 (55%) | 42 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 450 | 3 |
| TN | 8 | 08 (82%) | 36 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 201 | 1 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| TX | 4 | 04 (55%) | 42 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 39 | 8 | 729 | 4 |
| TX | 5 | 05 (61%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 48 | 8 | 21 | 2 | 883 | 4 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 7 | 63 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 48 | 10 | 7491 | 9 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 9 | 09 (65%) | 69 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 4853 | 9 |
| TX | 10 | 39 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 41 | 7 | 37 | 8 | 476 | 3 | |
| TX | 11 | 11 (75%) | 44 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 52 | 8 | 22 | 2 | 892 | 4 |
| TX | 13 | 13 (83%) | 35 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 389 | 2 |
| TX | 14 | 14 (88%) | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 44 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1026 | 5 |
| TX | 16 | 16 (94%) | 56 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 3295 | 8 |
| TX | 17 | 17 (54%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 43 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 467 | 3 |
| TX | 18 | 18 (77%) | 66 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 26 | 3 | 4434 | 8 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 21 | 21 (76%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 42 | 9 | 783 | 4 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 | |
| TX | 27 | 27 (86%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 59 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 653 | 4 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| TX | 32 | 61 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 6418 | 9 | |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| TX | 36 | 36 (73%) | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 47 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 755 | 4 |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| VA | 9 | 09 (81%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 149 | 1 |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| VA | 11 | 11 (68%) | 64 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 66 | 10 | 4091 | 8 |
| WA | 1 | 01 (65%) | 68 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 37 | 6 | 48 | 10 | 3514 | 8 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 5 | 05 (97%) | 41 | 44 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 475 | 3 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| WA | 9 | 09 (84%) | 77 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 39 | 8 | 4982 | 9 |
| WA | 10 | 10 (93%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 29 | 5 | 2330 | 7 |
| WI | 4 | 04 (88%) | 71 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 31 | 6 | 7033 | 9 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| WV | 1 | 03 (64%) | 30 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 151 | 1 |
| WV | 2 | 01 (67%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 22 | 2 | 239 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 1 | 06 (74%) | 50 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 3134 | 8 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| KS | 3 | 03 (92%) | 53 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 1711 | 6 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 4 | 04 (89%) | 62 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 19 | 2 | 46 | 9 | 2044 | 7 |
| MA | 6 | 06 (96%) | 66 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 20 | 3 | 47 | 9 | 2347 | 7 |
| MO | 2 | 02 (71%) | 49 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 14 | 2 | 47 | 9 | 1452 | 6 |
| NJ | 7 | 07 (72%) | 46 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 1071 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| AZ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 49 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 3137 | 8 |
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| IL | 8 | 08 (66%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 3634 | 8 |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| MT | 1 | 00 (100%) | 43 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 128 | 1 |
| NE | 1 | 01 (89%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 1017 | 5 |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| OR | 6 | 05 (58%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 34 | 6 | 1910 | 6 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| UT | 4 | 04 (83%) | 45 | 30 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 2218 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 23 | 08 (85%) | 46 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 806 | 4 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NV | 4 | 04 (83%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 58 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 2417 | 7 |
| NY | 11 | 11 (87%) | 66 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 46 | 7 | 36 | 7 | 19506 | 10 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 11 | 11 (75%) | 44 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 52 | 8 | 22 | 2 | 892 | 4 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| TX | 27 | 27 (86%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 59 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 653 | 4 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 6 | 02 (69%) | 42 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 36 | 7 | 821 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CT | 5 | 05 (99%) | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 33 | 5 | 37 | 7 | 1228 | 5 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| MA | 3 | 03 (96%) | 62 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 38 | 8 | 1905 | 6 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 15 | 49 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 5 | 2056 | 7 | |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| NJ | 1 | 01 (95%) | 54 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 3026 | 7 |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| NY | 18 | 18 (70%) | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 34 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 836 | 4 |
| TX | 5 | 05 (61%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 48 | 8 | 21 | 2 | 883 | 4 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 14 | 14 (88%) | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 44 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1026 | 5 |
| TX | 17 | 17 (54%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 43 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 467 | 3 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 | |
| TX | 36 | 36 (73%) | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 47 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 755 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| NC | 11 | 11 (79%) | 36 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 226 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| ID | 1 | 01 (100%) | 36 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 307 | 2 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| NC | 11 | 11 (79%) | 36 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 226 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 1 | 06 (74%) | 50 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 3134 | 8 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| KS | 3 | 03 (92%) | 53 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 1711 | 6 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 4 | 04 (89%) | 62 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 19 | 2 | 46 | 9 | 2044 | 7 |
| MA | 6 | 06 (96%) | 66 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 20 | 3 | 47 | 9 | 2347 | 7 |
| MO | 2 | 02 (71%) | 49 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 14 | 2 | 47 | 9 | 1452 | 6 |
| NJ | 7 | 07 (72%) | 46 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 1071 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| FL | 8 | 08 (100%) | 43 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1580 | 6 |
| GA | 9 | 09 (68%) | 32 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 413 | 3 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OH | 15 | 52 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1442 | 5 | |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| IN | 5 | 05 (75%) | 48 | 41 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 17 | 2 | 38 | 8 | 962 | 5 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| MD | 6 | 06 (89%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 1042 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| PA | 1 | 01 (93%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 42 | 8 | 1681 | 6 |
| PA | 17 | 17 (94%) | 50 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 16 | 2 | 41 | 8 | 1487 | 6 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 2 | 01 (66%) | 32 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 23 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| FL | 7 | 07 (62%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1877 | 6 |
| FL | 11 | 42 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 985 | 5 | |
| FL | 16 | 16 (80%) | 47 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 1969 | 7 |
| MI | 3 | 02 (50%) | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 1930 | 6 |
| NJ | 1 | 01 (95%) | 54 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 3026 | 7 |
| NJ | 2 | 02 (90%) | 42 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 891 | 4 |
| NY | 18 | 18 (70%) | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 34 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 836 | 4 |
| OK | 1 | 01 (96%) | 44 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1685 | 6 |
| OK | 5 | 05 (79%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 1069 | 5 |
| WA | 10 | 10 (93%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 29 | 5 | 2330 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| CA | 1 | 01 (73%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 332 | 2 |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| GA | 9 | 09 (68%) | 32 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 413 | 3 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MO | 3 | 03 (58%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 518 | 3 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| NY | 19 | 43 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 18 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 286 | 2 | |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| TN | 2 | 02 (95%) | 41 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 700 | 4 |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 1 | 01 (91%) | 35 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 101 | 1 |
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| GA | 14 | 14 (90%) | 35 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 454 | 3 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 8 | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 365 | 2 | |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| SC | 3 | 03 (95%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 26 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 245 | 2 |
| TN | 6 | 06 (72%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 344 | 2 |
| TN | 8 | 08 (82%) | 36 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 201 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 6 | 02 (69%) | 42 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 36 | 7 | 821 | 4 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| CT | 5 | 05 (99%) | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 33 | 5 | 37 | 7 | 1228 | 5 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 3 | 03 (96%) | 62 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 38 | 8 | 1905 | 6 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| NY | 20 | 20 (88%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 40 | 8 | 1559 | 6 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 6 | 06 (90%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 593 | 3 |
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 14 | 14 (67%) | 57 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 36 | 7 | 4041 | 8 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| NC | 4 | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 42 | 8 | 886 | 4 | |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NY | 4 | 04 (84%) | 68 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 8 | 42 | 9 | 8189 | 9 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| OH | 3 | 03 (67%) | 69 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 43 | 9 | 4662 | 9 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| VA | 7 | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 46 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 1036 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 2 | 02 (93%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 210 | 1 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 4 | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 45 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1203 | 5 | |
| GA | 1 | 01 (97%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 369 | 2 |
| GA | 8 | 08 (81%) | 37 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 39 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 196 | 1 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| GA | 12 | 12 (85%) | 44 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 45 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 263 | 2 |
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| MO | 5 | 05 (84%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 2574 | 7 |
| MS | 3 | 03 (91%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 26 | 3 | 160 | 1 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 | |
| SC | 2 | 02 (96%) | 49 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 33 | 6 | 642 | 3 |
| SC | 4 | 04 (97%) | 50 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1041 | 5 |
| VA | 2 | 02 (65%) | 54 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 39 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1363 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| IN | 5 | 05 (75%) | 48 | 41 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 17 | 2 | 38 | 8 | 962 | 5 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| PA | 1 | 01 (93%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 42 | 8 | 1681 | 6 |
| PA | 17 | 17 (94%) | 50 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 16 | 2 | 41 | 8 | 1487 | 6 |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 1 | 06 (74%) | 50 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 3134 | 8 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| KS | 3 | 03 (92%) | 53 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 1711 | 6 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 4 | 04 (89%) | 62 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 19 | 2 | 46 | 9 | 2044 | 7 |
| MA | 6 | 06 (96%) | 66 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 20 | 3 | 47 | 9 | 2347 | 7 |
| MO | 2 | 02 (71%) | 49 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 14 | 2 | 47 | 9 | 1452 | 6 |
| NJ | 7 | 07 (72%) | 46 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 1071 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 7 | 07 (62%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1877 | 6 |
| FL | 11 | 42 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 985 | 5 | |
| FL | 15 | 49 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 5 | 2056 | 7 | |
| FL | 16 | 16 (80%) | 47 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 1969 | 7 |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| MI | 3 | 02 (50%) | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 1930 | 6 |
| NJ | 1 | 01 (95%) | 54 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 3026 | 7 |
| NJ | 2 | 02 (90%) | 42 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 891 | 4 |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| NY | 18 | 18 (70%) | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 34 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 836 | 4 |
| OK | 5 | 05 (79%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 1069 | 5 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 8 | 08 (100%) | 43 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1580 | 6 |
| GA | 9 | 09 (68%) | 32 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 413 | 3 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 2 | 02 (73%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 26 | 4 | 295 | 2 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OH | 8 | 08 (64%) | 50 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 29 | 5 | 1280 | 5 |
| OH | 13 | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1890 | 6 | |
| OH | 15 | 52 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1442 | 5 | |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 8 | 08 (100%) | 43 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1580 | 6 |
| GA | 9 | 09 (68%) | 32 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 413 | 3 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 2 | 02 (73%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 26 | 4 | 295 | 2 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OH | 8 | 08 (64%) | 50 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 29 | 5 | 1280 | 5 |
| OH | 13 | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1890 | 6 | |
| OH | 15 | 52 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1442 | 5 | |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| WI | 1 | 01 (85%) | 52 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 1174 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| GA | 14 | 14 (90%) | 35 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 454 | 3 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 8 | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 365 | 2 | |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| SC | 3 | 03 (95%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 26 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 245 | 2 |
| TN | 4 | 04 (83%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 280 | 2 |
| TN | 6 | 06 (72%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 344 | 2 |
| TN | 8 | 08 (82%) | 36 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 201 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| IN | 5 | 05 (75%) | 48 | 41 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 17 | 2 | 38 | 8 | 962 | 5 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| MD | 6 | 06 (89%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 1042 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| PA | 1 | 01 (93%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 42 | 8 | 1681 | 6 |
| PA | 17 | 17 (94%) | 50 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 16 | 2 | 41 | 8 | 1487 | 6 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| AZ | 9 | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 20 | 1 | 715 | 4 | |
| CA | 1 | 01 (73%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 332 | 2 |
| FL | 8 | 08 (100%) | 43 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1580 | 6 |
| GA | 9 | 09 (68%) | 32 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 413 | 3 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OH | 15 | 52 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1442 | 5 | |
| OK | 3 | 03 (74%) | 27 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 183 | 1 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 8 | 08 (100%) | 43 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1580 | 6 |
| GA | 9 | 09 (68%) | 32 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 413 | 3 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OH | 8 | 08 (64%) | 50 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 29 | 5 | 1280 | 5 |
| OH | 13 | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1890 | 6 | |
| OH | 15 | 52 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1442 | 5 | |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| FL | 27 | 27 (82%) | 61 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 83 | 10 | 39 | 8 | 9355 | 10 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 16 | 16 (94%) | 56 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 3295 | 8 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| TX | 34 | 34 (75%) | 50 | 62 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 90 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 1373 | 5 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| MO | 5 | 05 (84%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 2574 | 7 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 | |
| NY | 26 | 26 (89%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 3694 | 8 |
| SC | 2 | 02 (96%) | 49 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 33 | 6 | 642 | 3 |
| SC | 4 | 04 (97%) | 50 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1041 | 5 |
| VA | 2 | 02 (65%) | 54 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 39 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1363 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 6 | 06 (90%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 593 | 3 |
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 14 | 14 (67%) | 57 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 36 | 7 | 4041 | 8 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| NC | 4 | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 42 | 8 | 886 | 4 | |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NY | 4 | 04 (84%) | 68 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 8 | 42 | 9 | 8189 | 9 |
| OH | 3 | 03 (67%) | 69 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 43 | 9 | 4662 | 9 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| VA | 7 | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 46 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 1036 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | 2 | 02 (96%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 381 | 2 |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MN | 1 | 01 (90%) | 37 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 214 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| PA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 41 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 22 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 715 | 4 |
| PA | 11 | 11 (97%) | 40 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 888 | 4 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WA | 5 | 05 (97%) | 41 | 44 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 475 | 3 |
| WI | 6 | 06 (97%) | 46 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| IN | 5 | 05 (75%) | 48 | 41 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 17 | 2 | 38 | 8 | 962 | 5 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 13 | 13 (70%) | 50 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 3817 | 8 |
| FL | 17 | 17 (61%) | 41 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 30 | 5 | 1426 | 5 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| KS | 2 | 02 (73%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 26 | 4 | 295 | 2 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| MO | 3 | 03 (58%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 518 | 3 |
| NY | 19 | 43 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 18 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 286 | 2 | |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| OH | 13 | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1890 | 6 | |
| TN | 2 | 02 (95%) | 41 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 700 | 4 |
| WI | 1 | 01 (85%) | 52 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 1174 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 10 | 11 (61%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 53 | 10 | 3109 | 8 |
| CA | 19 | 54 | 69 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 48 | 8 | 44 | 9 | 2303 | 7 | |
| CA | 30 | 28 (85%) | 67 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 43 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 11776 | 10 |
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 40 | 45 (64%) | 61 | 47 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 48 | 8 | 49 | 10 | 4390 | 8 |
| CA | 47 | 48 (63%) | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 7 | 56 | 10 | 6215 | 9 |
| CA | 51 | 53 (51%) | 64 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 6383 | 9 |
| NJ | 6 | 06 (89%) | 63 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 40 | 8 | 5104 | 9 |
| NJ | 12 | 12 (87%) | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 48 | 10 | 2928 | 7 |
| NY | 3 | 03 (64%) | 65 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 42 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 6713 | 9 |
| WA | 9 | 09 (84%) | 77 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 39 | 8 | 4982 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 14 | 15 (86%) | 67 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 5491 | 9 |
| CA | 15 | 14 (82%) | 70 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 47 | 9 | 10116 | 10 |
| CA | 17 | 17 (90%) | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 77 | 10 | 59 | 10 | 7865 | 9 |
| CA | 28 | 27 (87%) | 67 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 45 | 9 | 6661 | 9 |
| CA | 45 | 66 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 72 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 8207 | 10 | |
| HI | 1 | 01 (100%) | 63 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 37 | 7 | 8541 | 10 |
| HI | 2 | 02 (99%) | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 68 | 9 | 30 | 5 | 808 | 4 |
| NY | 6 | 06 (81%) | 72 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 75 | 10 | 37 | 8 | 42610 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 30 | 28 (85%) | 67 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 43 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 11776 | 10 |
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| IL | 11 | 59 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 2011 | 7 | |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 3 | 03 (76%) | 48 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 1833 | 6 |
| TX | 21 | 21 (76%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 42 | 9 | 783 | 4 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 26 | 26 (74%) | 45 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 40 | 6 | 43 | 9 | 1462 | 6 |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 23 | 08 (85%) | 46 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 806 | 4 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| IL | 8 | 08 (66%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 3634 | 8 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NV | 4 | 04 (83%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 58 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 2417 | 7 |
| NY | 11 | 11 (87%) | 66 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 46 | 7 | 36 | 7 | 19506 | 10 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 11 | 11 (75%) | 44 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 52 | 8 | 22 | 2 | 892 | 4 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| TX | 27 | 27 (86%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 59 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 653 | 4 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| FL | 27 | 27 (82%) | 61 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 83 | 10 | 39 | 8 | 9355 | 10 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 16 | 16 (94%) | 56 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 3295 | 8 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| TX | 34 | 34 (75%) | 50 | 62 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 90 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 1373 | 5 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| FL | 27 | 27 (82%) | 61 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 83 | 10 | 39 | 8 | 9355 | 10 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 16 | 16 (94%) | 56 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 3295 | 8 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| TX | 34 | 34 (75%) | 50 | 62 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 90 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 1373 | 5 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MO | 3 | 03 (58%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 518 | 3 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NY | 19 | 43 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 18 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 286 | 2 | |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| TN | 2 | 02 (95%) | 41 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 700 | 4 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 8 | 08 (100%) | 43 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1580 | 6 |
| GA | 9 | 09 (68%) | 32 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 413 | 3 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| NC | 8 | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 365 | 2 | |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OH | 8 | 08 (64%) | 50 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 29 | 5 | 1280 | 5 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| OH | 13 | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1890 | 6 | |
| OH | 15 | 52 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1442 | 5 | |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| SC | 3 | 03 (95%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 26 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 245 | 2 |
| TN | 8 | 08 (82%) | 36 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 201 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| IL | 11 | 59 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 2011 | 7 | |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NE | 2 | 02 (97%) | 58 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 28 | 4 | 40 | 8 | 2541 | 7 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 2 | 48 | 36 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 1887 | 6 | |
| TX | 3 | 03 (76%) | 48 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 1833 | 6 |
| TX | 10 | 39 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 41 | 7 | 37 | 8 | 476 | 3 | |
| TX | 21 | 21 (76%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 42 | 9 | 783 | 4 |
| TX | 26 | 26 (74%) | 45 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 40 | 6 | 43 | 9 | 1462 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 1 | 06 (74%) | 50 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 3134 | 8 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| KS | 3 | 03 (92%) | 53 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 1711 | 6 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 4 | 04 (89%) | 62 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 19 | 2 | 46 | 9 | 2044 | 7 |
| MA | 6 | 06 (96%) | 66 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 20 | 3 | 47 | 9 | 2347 | 7 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| MO | 2 | 02 (71%) | 49 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 14 | 2 | 47 | 9 | 1452 | 6 |
| NJ | 7 | 07 (72%) | 46 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 1071 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| FL | 7 | 07 (62%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1877 | 6 |
| FL | 11 | 42 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 985 | 5 | |
| FL | 15 | 49 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 5 | 2056 | 7 | |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| NJ | 1 | 01 (95%) | 54 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 3026 | 7 |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| NY | 18 | 18 (70%) | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 34 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 836 | 4 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| TX | 5 | 05 (61%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 48 | 8 | 21 | 2 | 883 | 4 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 14 | 14 (88%) | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 44 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1026 | 5 |
| TX | 17 | 17 (54%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 43 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 467 | 3 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 | |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| TX | 36 | 36 (73%) | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 47 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 755 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 10 | 11 (61%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 53 | 10 | 3109 | 8 |
| CA | 19 | 54 | 69 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 48 | 8 | 44 | 9 | 2303 | 7 | |
| CA | 30 | 28 (85%) | 67 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 43 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 11776 | 10 |
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 40 | 45 (64%) | 61 | 47 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 48 | 8 | 49 | 10 | 4390 | 8 |
| CA | 47 | 48 (63%) | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 7 | 56 | 10 | 6215 | 9 |
| CA | 51 | 53 (51%) | 64 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 6383 | 9 |
| NJ | 6 | 06 (89%) | 63 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 40 | 8 | 5104 | 9 |
| NJ | 12 | 12 (87%) | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 48 | 10 | 2928 | 7 |
| NY | 3 | 03 (64%) | 65 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 42 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 6713 | 9 |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| WA | 9 | 09 (84%) | 77 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 39 | 8 | 4982 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 14 | 14 (67%) | 57 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 36 | 7 | 4041 | 8 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| NC | 4 | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 42 | 8 | 886 | 4 | |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| OH | 3 | 03 (67%) | 69 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 43 | 9 | 4662 | 9 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 6 | 02 (69%) | 42 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 36 | 7 | 821 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CT | 5 | 05 (99%) | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 33 | 5 | 37 | 7 | 1228 | 5 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 3 | 03 (96%) | 62 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 38 | 8 | 1905 | 6 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | 2 | 02 (96%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 381 | 2 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| MN | 1 | 01 (90%) | 37 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 214 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| PA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 41 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 22 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 715 | 4 |
| PA | 11 | 11 (97%) | 40 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 888 | 4 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WA | 5 | 05 (97%) | 41 | 44 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 475 | 3 |
| WI | 6 | 06 (97%) | 46 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| AZ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 49 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 3137 | 8 |
| MT | 1 | 00 (100%) | 43 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 128 | 1 |
| MT | 2 | 00 (100%) | 42 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 83 | 1 |
| NE | 1 | 01 (89%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 1017 | 5 |
| OR | 6 | 05 (58%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 34 | 6 | 1910 | 6 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| TX | 4 | 04 (55%) | 42 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 39 | 8 | 729 | 4 |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| UT | 4 | 04 (83%) | 45 | 30 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 2218 | 7 |
| WA | 10 | 10 (93%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 29 | 5 | 2330 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 5 | 05 (100%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 32 | 6 | 424 | 3 |
| FL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 42 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 960 | 5 |
| FL | 7 | 07 (62%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1877 | 6 |
| FL | 11 | 42 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 985 | 5 | |
| FL | 16 | 16 (80%) | 47 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 1969 | 7 |
| FL | 21 | 18 (98%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 32 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1723 | 6 |
| MI | 3 | 02 (50%) | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 1930 | 6 |
| NJ | 1 | 01 (95%) | 54 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 3026 | 7 |
| NJ | 2 | 02 (90%) | 42 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 891 | 4 |
| NY | 18 | 18 (70%) | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 34 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 836 | 4 |
| OK | 5 | 05 (79%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 1069 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 13 | 13 (70%) | 50 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 3817 | 8 |
| FL | 17 | 17 (61%) | 41 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 30 | 5 | 1426 | 5 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| KS | 2 | 02 (73%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 26 | 4 | 295 | 2 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MO | 3 | 03 (58%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 518 | 3 |
| NY | 19 | 43 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 18 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 286 | 2 | |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| TN | 2 | 02 (95%) | 41 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 700 | 4 |
| WI | 1 | 01 (85%) | 52 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 1174 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | 2 | 02 (96%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 381 | 2 |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| MN | 1 | 01 (90%) | 37 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 214 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| PA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 41 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 22 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 715 | 4 |
| PA | 11 | 11 (97%) | 40 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 888 | 4 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WA | 5 | 05 (97%) | 41 | 44 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 475 | 3 |
| WI | 6 | 06 (97%) | 46 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| NC | 11 | 11 (79%) | 36 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 226 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 10 | 11 (61%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 53 | 10 | 3109 | 8 |
| CA | 19 | 54 | 69 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 48 | 8 | 44 | 9 | 2303 | 7 | |
| CA | 30 | 28 (85%) | 67 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 43 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 11776 | 10 |
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 40 | 45 (64%) | 61 | 47 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 48 | 8 | 49 | 10 | 4390 | 8 |
| CA | 47 | 48 (63%) | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 7 | 56 | 10 | 6215 | 9 |
| CA | 51 | 53 (51%) | 64 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 6383 | 9 |
| NJ | 6 | 06 (89%) | 63 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 40 | 8 | 5104 | 9 |
| NJ | 12 | 12 (87%) | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 48 | 10 | 2928 | 7 |
| NY | 3 | 03 (64%) | 65 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 42 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 6713 | 9 |
| TX | 22 | 22 (75%) | 49 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 55 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 1362 | 5 |
| WA | 9 | 09 (84%) | 77 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 39 | 8 | 4982 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 13 | 16 (53%) | 49 | 55 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 74 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1174 | 5 |
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 25 | 36 (72%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 72 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 1538 | 6 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| IL | 8 | 08 (66%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 3634 | 8 |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NY | 11 | 11 (87%) | 66 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 46 | 7 | 36 | 7 | 19506 | 10 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 2 | 02 (78%) | 51 | 68 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 56 | 10 | 945 | 5 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| NY | 12 | 12 (60%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 79 | 10 | 102616 | 10 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 1 | 06 (74%) | 50 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 3134 | 8 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| KS | 3 | 03 (92%) | 53 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 1711 | 6 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 6 | 06 (96%) | 66 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 20 | 3 | 47 | 9 | 2347 | 7 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| MO | 2 | 02 (71%) | 49 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 14 | 2 | 47 | 9 | 1452 | 6 |
| NJ | 7 | 07 (72%) | 46 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 1071 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MO | 3 | 03 (58%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 518 | 3 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| PA | 1 | 01 (93%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 42 | 8 | 1681 | 6 |
| PA | 17 | 17 (94%) | 50 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 16 | 2 | 41 | 8 | 1487 | 6 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 6 | 06 (90%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 593 | 3 |
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 14 | 14 (67%) | 57 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 36 | 7 | 4041 | 8 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| NC | 4 | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 42 | 8 | 886 | 4 | |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| OH | 3 | 03 (67%) | 69 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 43 | 9 | 4662 | 9 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| VA | 7 | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 46 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 1036 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 6 | 06 (90%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 593 | 3 |
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| MI | 11 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 48 | 9 | 2921 | 7 | |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| NY | 25 | 25 (94%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2171 | 7 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 1 | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 780 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| MD | 5 | 05 (92%) | 64 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 1098 | 5 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| FL | 15 | 49 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 5 | 2056 | 7 | |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| NY | 18 | 18 (70%) | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 34 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 836 | 4 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| TX | 5 | 05 (61%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 48 | 8 | 21 | 2 | 883 | 4 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 14 | 14 (88%) | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 44 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1026 | 5 |
| TX | 17 | 17 (54%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 43 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 467 | 3 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 | |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| TX | 36 | 36 (73%) | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 47 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 755 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 3 | 03 (96%) | 39 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 195 | 1 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| FL | 18 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 525 | 3 | |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| MS | 1 | 01 (100%) | 33 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 186 | 1 |
| MS | 4 | 04 (100%) | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 301 | 2 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| SC | 7 | 07 (99%) | 40 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 312 | 2 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| FL | 13 | 13 (70%) | 50 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 3817 | 8 |
| FL | 17 | 17 (61%) | 41 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 30 | 5 | 1426 | 5 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| KS | 2 | 02 (73%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 26 | 4 | 295 | 2 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MO | 3 | 03 (58%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 518 | 3 |
| NY | 19 | 43 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 18 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 286 | 2 | |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| TN | 2 | 02 (95%) | 41 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 700 | 4 |
| WI | 1 | 01 (85%) | 52 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 1174 | 5 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| MA | 4 | 04 (89%) | 62 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 19 | 2 | 46 | 9 | 2044 | 7 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| MD | 6 | 06 (89%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 1042 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| MO | 2 | 02 (71%) | 49 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 14 | 2 | 47 | 9 | 1452 | 6 |
| PA | 1 | 01 (93%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 42 | 8 | 1681 | 6 |
| PA | 17 | 17 (94%) | 50 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 16 | 2 | 41 | 8 | 1487 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| MA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 75 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 4559 | 8 |
| MI | 6 | 12 (57%) | 55 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 28 | 4 | 50 | 10 | 1839 | 6 |
| MI | 11 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 48 | 9 | 2921 | 7 | |
| MN | 3 | 03 (94%) | 61 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 49 | 10 | 2102 | 7 |
| MN | 4 | 04 (100%) | 65 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 3319 | 8 |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| NJ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 39 | 6 | 51 | 10 | 2656 | 7 |
| NY | 25 | 25 (94%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2171 | 7 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 1 | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 780 | 4 | |
| WA | 1 | 01 (65%) | 68 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 37 | 6 | 48 | 10 | 3514 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| MD | 5 | 05 (92%) | 64 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 1098 | 5 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 7 | 07 (62%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1877 | 6 |
| FL | 11 | 42 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 985 | 5 | |
| FL | 15 | 49 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 5 | 2056 | 7 | |
| FL | 16 | 16 (80%) | 47 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 1969 | 7 |
| MI | 3 | 02 (50%) | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 1930 | 6 |
| NJ | 1 | 01 (95%) | 54 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 3026 | 7 |
| NJ | 2 | 02 (90%) | 42 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 891 | 4 |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| NY | 18 | 18 (70%) | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 34 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 836 | 4 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CO | 2 | 02 (78%) | 51 | 68 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 56 | 10 | 945 | 5 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| MI | 6 | 12 (57%) | 55 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 28 | 4 | 50 | 10 | 1839 | 6 |
| MI | 11 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 48 | 9 | 2921 | 7 | |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| NJ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 39 | 6 | 51 | 10 | 2656 | 7 |
| NY | 25 | 25 (94%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2171 | 7 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 1 | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 780 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 75 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 4559 | 8 |
| MI | 6 | 12 (57%) | 55 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 28 | 4 | 50 | 10 | 1839 | 6 |
| MI | 11 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 48 | 9 | 2921 | 7 | |
| MN | 3 | 03 (94%) | 61 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 49 | 10 | 2102 | 7 |
| MN | 4 | 04 (100%) | 65 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 3319 | 8 |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| NJ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 39 | 6 | 51 | 10 | 2656 | 7 |
| NY | 25 | 25 (94%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2171 | 7 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 1 | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 780 | 4 | |
| WA | 1 | 01 (65%) | 68 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 37 | 6 | 48 | 10 | 3514 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 24 | 24 (85%) | 56 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 46 | 7 | 37 | 7 | 2496 | 7 |
| CA | 26 | 26 (80%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 3116 | 8 |
| IL | 3 | 69 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 57 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 9512 | 10 | |
| NJ | 9 | 09 (83%) | 66 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 10010 | 10 |
| NM | 1 | 01 (74%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 51 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 1672 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 7 | 03 (73%) | 50 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 1633 | 6 |
| CA | 9 | 09 (75%) | 57 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 3261 | 8 |
| CA | 27 | 25 (80%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 2692 | 7 |
| FL | 9 | 09 (71%) | 50 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 1843 | 6 |
| IL | 3 | 69 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 57 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 9512 | 10 | |
| NJ | 9 | 09 (83%) | 66 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 10010 | 10 |
| NM | 2 | 02 (73%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 364 | 2 |
| NM | 3 | 03 (81%) | 47 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 62 | 9 | 24 | 3 | 119 | 1 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 23 | 08 (85%) | 46 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 806 | 4 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NV | 4 | 04 (83%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 58 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 2417 | 7 |
| NY | 11 | 11 (87%) | 66 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 46 | 7 | 36 | 7 | 19506 | 10 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 11 | 11 (75%) | 44 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 52 | 8 | 22 | 2 | 892 | 4 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| TX | 27 | 27 (86%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 59 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 653 | 4 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 23 | 08 (85%) | 46 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 806 | 4 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NV | 4 | 04 (83%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 58 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 2417 | 7 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 11 | 11 (75%) | 44 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 52 | 8 | 22 | 2 | 892 | 4 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| TX | 27 | 27 (86%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 59 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 653 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| IN | 5 | 05 (75%) | 48 | 41 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 17 | 2 | 38 | 8 | 962 | 5 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 3 | 03 (96%) | 62 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 38 | 8 | 1905 | 6 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| NY | 20 | 20 (88%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 40 | 8 | 1559 | 6 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 1 | 06 (74%) | 50 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 3134 | 8 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| KS | 3 | 03 (92%) | 53 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 1711 | 6 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 4 | 04 (89%) | 62 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 19 | 2 | 46 | 9 | 2044 | 7 |
| MA | 6 | 06 (96%) | 66 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 20 | 3 | 47 | 9 | 2347 | 7 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| MO | 2 | 02 (71%) | 49 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 14 | 2 | 47 | 9 | 1452 | 6 |
| NJ | 7 | 07 (72%) | 46 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 1071 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| NY | 20 | 20 (88%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 40 | 8 | 1559 | 6 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 1 | 06 (74%) | 50 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 3134 | 8 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| KS | 3 | 03 (92%) | 53 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 1711 | 6 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 6 | 06 (96%) | 66 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 20 | 3 | 47 | 9 | 2347 | 7 |
| MO | 2 | 02 (71%) | 49 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 14 | 2 | 47 | 9 | 1452 | 6 |
| NJ | 7 | 07 (72%) | 46 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 1071 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 7 | 03 (73%) | 50 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 1633 | 6 |
| CA | 9 | 09 (75%) | 57 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 3261 | 8 |
| CA | 27 | 25 (80%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 2692 | 7 |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| FL | 9 | 09 (71%) | 50 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 1843 | 6 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| FL | 27 | 27 (82%) | 61 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 83 | 10 | 39 | 8 | 9355 | 10 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| NM | 2 | 02 (73%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 364 | 2 |
| NM | 3 | 03 (81%) | 47 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 62 | 9 | 24 | 3 | 119 | 1 |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 16 | 16 (94%) | 56 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 3295 | 8 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 34 | 34 (75%) | 50 | 62 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 90 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 1373 | 5 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 11 | 12 (92%) | 70 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 63 | 10 | 26597 | 10 |
| CA | 16 | 18 (69%) | 66 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 61 | 10 | 5440 | 9 |
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| NY | 10 | 71 | 87 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 59 | 10 | 66619 | 10 | |
| NY | 12 | 12 (60%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 79 | 10 | 102616 | 10 |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| VA | 11 | 11 (68%) | 64 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 66 | 10 | 4091 | 8 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 1 | 06 (74%) | 50 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 3134 | 8 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| KS | 3 | 03 (92%) | 53 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 1711 | 6 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 4 | 04 (89%) | 62 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 19 | 2 | 46 | 9 | 2044 | 7 |
| MA | 6 | 06 (96%) | 66 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 20 | 3 | 47 | 9 | 2347 | 7 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| MO | 2 | 02 (71%) | 49 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 14 | 2 | 47 | 9 | 1452 | 6 |
| NJ | 7 | 07 (72%) | 46 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 1071 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| NY | 20 | 20 (88%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 40 | 8 | 1559 | 6 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| AZ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 49 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 3137 | 8 |
| MT | 1 | 00 (100%) | 43 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 128 | 1 |
| MT | 2 | 00 (100%) | 42 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 83 | 1 |
| NE | 1 | 01 (89%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 1017 | 5 |
| OR | 6 | 05 (58%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 34 | 6 | 1910 | 6 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| TX | 4 | 04 (55%) | 42 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 39 | 8 | 729 | 4 |
| UT | 4 | 04 (83%) | 45 | 30 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 2218 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 23 | 08 (85%) | 46 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 806 | 4 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| IL | 8 | 08 (66%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 3634 | 8 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NV | 4 | 04 (83%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 58 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 2417 | 7 |
| NY | 11 | 11 (87%) | 66 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 46 | 7 | 36 | 7 | 19506 | 10 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 11 | 11 (75%) | 44 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 52 | 8 | 22 | 2 | 892 | 4 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| TX | 27 | 27 (86%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 59 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 653 | 4 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 23 | 08 (85%) | 46 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 806 | 4 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 4 | 04 (83%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 58 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 2417 | 7 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 11 | 11 (75%) | 44 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 52 | 8 | 22 | 2 | 892 | 4 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| TX | 27 | 27 (86%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 59 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 653 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 7 | 07 (62%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1877 | 6 |
| FL | 11 | 42 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 985 | 5 | |
| FL | 16 | 16 (80%) | 47 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 1969 | 7 |
| MI | 3 | 02 (50%) | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 1930 | 6 |
| NJ | 1 | 01 (95%) | 54 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 3026 | 7 |
| NJ | 2 | 02 (90%) | 42 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 891 | 4 |
| NY | 18 | 18 (70%) | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 34 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 836 | 4 |
| OK | 1 | 01 (96%) | 44 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1685 | 6 |
| OK | 5 | 05 (79%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 1069 | 5 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| IN | 5 | 05 (75%) | 48 | 41 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 17 | 2 | 38 | 8 | 962 | 5 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| MD | 6 | 06 (89%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 1042 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| PA | 1 | 01 (93%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 42 | 8 | 1681 | 6 |
| PA | 17 | 17 (94%) | 50 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 16 | 2 | 41 | 8 | 1487 | 6 |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 5 | 05 (100%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 32 | 6 | 424 | 3 |
| FL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 42 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 960 | 5 |
| FL | 21 | 18 (98%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 32 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1723 | 6 |
| MD | 1 | 01 (60%) | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 654 | 4 |
| NJ | 2 | 02 (90%) | 42 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 891 | 4 |
| OH | 10 | 10 (90%) | 54 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 26 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1725 | 6 |
| PA | 12 | 18 (86%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 38 | 8 | 3147 | 8 |
| TN | 7 | 07 (55%) | 42 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 450 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 6 | 06 (90%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 593 | 3 |
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| MI | 6 | 12 (57%) | 55 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 28 | 4 | 50 | 10 | 1839 | 6 |
| MI | 11 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 48 | 9 | 2921 | 7 | |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| NY | 25 | 25 (94%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2171 | 7 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 1 | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 780 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 7 | 07 (62%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1877 | 6 |
| FL | 11 | 42 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 985 | 5 | |
| FL | 16 | 16 (80%) | 47 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 1969 | 7 |
| MI | 3 | 02 (50%) | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 1930 | 6 |
| NJ | 1 | 01 (95%) | 54 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 3026 | 7 |
| NJ | 2 | 02 (90%) | 42 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 891 | 4 |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| NY | 18 | 18 (70%) | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 34 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 836 | 4 |
| OK | 1 | 01 (96%) | 44 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1685 | 6 |
| OK | 5 | 05 (79%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 1069 | 5 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 6 | 06 (90%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 593 | 3 |
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 7 | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 46 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 1036 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| ID | 1 | 01 (100%) | 36 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 307 | 2 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| NC | 11 | 11 (79%) | 36 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 226 | 1 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| IN | 5 | 05 (75%) | 48 | 41 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 17 | 2 | 38 | 8 | 962 | 5 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| NY | 20 | 20 (88%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 40 | 8 | 1559 | 6 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| CA | 1 | 01 (73%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 332 | 2 |
| CA | 5 | 44 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 921 | 4 | |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| OK | 3 | 03 (74%) | 27 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 183 | 1 |
| OK | 4 | 04 (97%) | 34 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 5 | 05 (100%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 32 | 6 | 424 | 3 |
| FL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 42 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 960 | 5 |
| FL | 21 | 18 (98%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 32 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1723 | 6 |
| MD | 1 | 01 (60%) | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 654 | 4 |
| OH | 10 | 10 (90%) | 54 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 26 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1725 | 6 |
| PA | 12 | 18 (86%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 38 | 8 | 3147 | 8 |
| TN | 7 | 07 (55%) | 42 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 450 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| KY | 2 | 02 (87%) | 36 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 269 | 2 |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 1 | 06 (74%) | 50 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 3134 | 8 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| KS | 3 | 03 (92%) | 53 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 1711 | 6 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 4 | 04 (89%) | 62 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 19 | 2 | 46 | 9 | 2044 | 7 |
| MA | 6 | 06 (96%) | 66 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 20 | 3 | 47 | 9 | 2347 | 7 |
| MD | 6 | 06 (89%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 1042 | 5 |
| MO | 2 | 02 (71%) | 49 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 14 | 2 | 47 | 9 | 1452 | 6 |
| NJ | 7 | 07 (72%) | 46 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 1071 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AR | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 31 | 6 | 564 | 3 |
| FL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 42 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 960 | 5 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| FL | 18 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 525 | 3 | |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| NY | 26 | 26 (89%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 3694 | 8 |
| OH | 10 | 10 (90%) | 54 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 26 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1725 | 6 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| TN | 7 | 07 (55%) | 42 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 450 | 3 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| AZ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 49 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 3137 | 8 |
| MT | 1 | 00 (100%) | 43 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 128 | 1 |
| MT | 2 | 00 (100%) | 42 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 83 | 1 |
| NE | 1 | 01 (89%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 1017 | 5 |
| OR | 6 | 05 (58%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 34 | 6 | 1910 | 6 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| TX | 4 | 04 (55%) | 42 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 39 | 8 | 729 | 4 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| UT | 4 | 04 (83%) | 45 | 30 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 2218 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| IN | 5 | 05 (75%) | 48 | 41 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 17 | 2 | 38 | 8 | 962 | 5 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| PA | 17 | 17 (94%) | 50 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 16 | 2 | 41 | 8 | 1487 | 6 |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| FL | 13 | 13 (70%) | 50 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 3817 | 8 |
| FL | 17 | 17 (61%) | 41 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 30 | 5 | 1426 | 5 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MO | 3 | 03 (58%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 518 | 3 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NY | 19 | 43 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 18 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 286 | 2 | |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| TN | 2 | 02 (95%) | 41 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 700 | 4 |
| WI | 1 | 01 (85%) | 52 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 1174 | 5 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 6 | 06 (90%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 593 | 3 |
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| NC | 4 | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 42 | 8 | 886 | 4 | |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| OH | 3 | 03 (67%) | 69 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 43 | 9 | 4662 | 9 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 7 | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 46 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 1036 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 4 | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 45 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1203 | 5 | |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| MO | 5 | 05 (84%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 2574 | 7 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 | |
| SC | 2 | 02 (96%) | 49 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 33 | 6 | 642 | 3 |
| SC | 4 | 04 (97%) | 50 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1041 | 5 |
| VA | 2 | 02 (65%) | 54 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 39 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1363 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| FL | 15 | 49 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 5 | 2056 | 7 | |
| IL | 8 | 08 (66%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 3634 | 8 |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| NE | 1 | 01 (89%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 1017 | 5 |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| OR | 6 | 05 (58%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 34 | 6 | 1910 | 6 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 | |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| UT | 4 | 04 (83%) | 45 | 30 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 2218 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| NE | 2 | 02 (97%) | 58 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 28 | 4 | 40 | 8 | 2541 | 7 |
| TX | 2 | 48 | 36 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 1887 | 6 | |
| TX | 3 | 03 (76%) | 48 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 1833 | 6 |
| TX | 10 | 39 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 41 | 7 | 37 | 8 | 476 | 3 | |
| TX | 26 | 26 (74%) | 45 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 40 | 6 | 43 | 9 | 1462 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 19 | 54 | 69 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 48 | 8 | 44 | 9 | 2303 | 7 | |
| CA | 24 | 24 (85%) | 56 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 46 | 7 | 37 | 7 | 2496 | 7 |
| CA | 26 | 26 (80%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 3116 | 8 |
| CA | 51 | 53 (51%) | 64 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 6383 | 9 |
| NJ | 6 | 06 (89%) | 63 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 40 | 8 | 5104 | 9 |
| NJ | 12 | 12 (87%) | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 48 | 10 | 2928 | 7 |
| TX | 22 | 22 (75%) | 49 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 55 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 1362 | 5 |
| WA | 9 | 09 (84%) | 77 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 39 | 8 | 4982 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| IL | 11 | 59 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 2011 | 7 | |
| NE | 2 | 02 (97%) | 58 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 28 | 4 | 40 | 8 | 2541 | 7 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 2 | 48 | 36 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 1887 | 6 | |
| TX | 3 | 03 (76%) | 48 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 1833 | 6 |
| TX | 10 | 39 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 41 | 7 | 37 | 8 | 476 | 3 | |
| TX | 21 | 21 (76%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 42 | 9 | 783 | 4 |
| TX | 26 | 26 (74%) | 45 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 40 | 6 | 43 | 9 | 1462 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| IL | 11 | 59 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 2011 | 7 | |
| NE | 2 | 02 (97%) | 58 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 28 | 4 | 40 | 8 | 2541 | 7 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 2 | 48 | 36 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 1887 | 6 | |
| TX | 3 | 03 (76%) | 48 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 1833 | 6 |
| TX | 10 | 39 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 41 | 7 | 37 | 8 | 476 | 3 | |
| TX | 21 | 21 (76%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 42 | 9 | 783 | 4 |
| TX | 26 | 26 (74%) | 45 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 40 | 6 | 43 | 9 | 1462 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| AZ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 49 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 3137 | 8 |
| MT | 1 | 00 (100%) | 43 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 128 | 1 |
| MT | 2 | 00 (100%) | 42 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 83 | 1 |
| NE | 1 | 01 (89%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 1017 | 5 |
| OR | 6 | 05 (58%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 34 | 6 | 1910 | 6 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| TX | 4 | 04 (55%) | 42 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 39 | 8 | 729 | 4 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| UT | 4 | 04 (83%) | 45 | 30 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 2218 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| MA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 75 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 4559 | 8 |
| MI | 6 | 12 (57%) | 55 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 28 | 4 | 50 | 10 | 1839 | 6 |
| MI | 11 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 48 | 9 | 2921 | 7 | |
| MN | 3 | 03 (94%) | 61 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 49 | 10 | 2102 | 7 |
| MN | 4 | 04 (100%) | 65 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 3319 | 8 |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| NJ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 39 | 6 | 51 | 10 | 2656 | 7 |
| NY | 25 | 25 (94%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2171 | 7 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 1 | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 780 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| IL | 8 | 08 (66%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 3634 | 8 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NY | 11 | 11 (87%) | 66 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 46 | 7 | 36 | 7 | 19506 | 10 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 11 | 11 (75%) | 44 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 52 | 8 | 22 | 2 | 892 | 4 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| IN | 5 | 05 (75%) | 48 | 41 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 17 | 2 | 38 | 8 | 962 | 5 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| PA | 1 | 01 (93%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 42 | 8 | 1681 | 6 |
| PA | 17 | 17 (94%) | 50 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 16 | 2 | 41 | 8 | 1487 | 6 |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | 2 | 02 (96%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 381 | 2 |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| MN | 1 | 01 (90%) | 37 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 214 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| PA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 41 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 22 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 715 | 4 |
| PA | 11 | 11 (97%) | 40 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 888 | 4 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WA | 5 | 05 (97%) | 41 | 44 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 475 | 3 |
| WI | 6 | 06 (97%) | 46 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | 2 | 02 (96%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 381 | 2 |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| MN | 1 | 01 (90%) | 37 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 214 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| PA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 41 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 22 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 715 | 4 |
| PA | 11 | 11 (97%) | 40 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 888 | 4 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WA | 5 | 05 (97%) | 41 | 44 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 475 | 3 |
| WI | 6 | 06 (97%) | 46 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 13 | 16 (53%) | 49 | 55 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 74 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1174 | 5 |
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 25 | 36 (72%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 72 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 1538 | 6 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| KS | 3 | 03 (92%) | 53 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 1711 | 6 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| NJ | 7 | 07 (72%) | 46 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 1071 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 13 | 16 (53%) | 49 | 55 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 74 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1174 | 5 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 25 | 36 (72%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 72 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 1538 | 6 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 1 | 01 (91%) | 35 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 101 | 1 |
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| GA | 14 | 14 (90%) | 35 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 454 | 3 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 8 | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 365 | 2 | |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| SC | 3 | 03 (95%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 26 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 245 | 2 |
| TN | 4 | 04 (83%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 280 | 2 |
| TN | 6 | 06 (72%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 344 | 2 |
| TN | 8 | 08 (82%) | 36 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 201 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| IN | 5 | 05 (75%) | 48 | 41 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 17 | 2 | 38 | 8 | 962 | 5 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| MD | 6 | 06 (89%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 1042 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| PA | 1 | 01 (93%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 42 | 8 | 1681 | 6 |
| PA | 17 | 17 (94%) | 50 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 16 | 2 | 41 | 8 | 1487 | 6 |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 7 | 03 (73%) | 50 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 1633 | 6 |
| CA | 9 | 09 (75%) | 57 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 3261 | 8 |
| CA | 27 | 25 (80%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 2692 | 7 |
| FL | 9 | 09 (71%) | 50 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 1843 | 6 |
| IL | 3 | 69 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 57 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 9512 | 10 | |
| NJ | 9 | 09 (83%) | 66 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 10010 | 10 |
| NM | 2 | 02 (73%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 364 | 2 |
| NM | 3 | 03 (81%) | 47 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 62 | 9 | 24 | 3 | 119 | 1 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 7 | 03 (73%) | 50 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 1633 | 6 |
| CA | 9 | 09 (75%) | 57 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 3261 | 8 |
| CA | 27 | 25 (80%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 2692 | 7 |
| FL | 9 | 09 (71%) | 50 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 1843 | 6 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| IL | 3 | 69 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 57 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 9512 | 10 | |
| NJ | 9 | 09 (83%) | 66 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 10010 | 10 |
| NM | 2 | 02 (73%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 364 | 2 |
| NM | 3 | 03 (81%) | 47 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 62 | 9 | 24 | 3 | 119 | 1 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 7 | 03 (73%) | 50 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 1633 | 6 |
| CA | 7 | 06 (56%) | 63 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 4527 | 8 |
| CA | 8 | 64 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 4073 | 8 | |
| CA | 9 | 09 (75%) | 57 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 3261 | 8 |
| CA | 27 | 25 (80%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 2692 | 7 |
| FL | 9 | 09 (71%) | 50 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 1843 | 6 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| IL | 3 | 69 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 57 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 9512 | 10 | |
| NJ | 9 | 09 (83%) | 66 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 10010 | 10 |
| NM | 2 | 02 (73%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 364 | 2 |
| NM | 3 | 03 (81%) | 47 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 62 | 9 | 24 | 3 | 119 | 1 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| MD | 6 | 06 (89%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 1042 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| PA | 1 | 01 (93%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 42 | 8 | 1681 | 6 |
| PA | 17 | 17 (94%) | 50 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 16 | 2 | 41 | 8 | 1487 | 6 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| FL | 27 | 27 (82%) | 61 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 83 | 10 | 39 | 8 | 9355 | 10 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 16 | 16 (94%) | 56 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 3295 | 8 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| TX | 34 | 34 (75%) | 50 | 62 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 90 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 1373 | 5 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| FL | 27 | 27 (82%) | 61 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 83 | 10 | 39 | 8 | 9355 | 10 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 16 | 16 (94%) | 56 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 3295 | 8 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| TX | 34 | 34 (75%) | 50 | 62 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 90 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 1373 | 5 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 13 | 13 (70%) | 50 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 3817 | 8 |
| FL | 17 | 17 (61%) | 41 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 30 | 5 | 1426 | 5 |
| ID | 2 | 02 (96%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 381 | 2 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| KS | 2 | 02 (73%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 26 | 4 | 295 | 2 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| MO | 3 | 03 (58%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 518 | 3 |
| NY | 19 | 43 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 18 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 286 | 2 | |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| TN | 2 | 02 (95%) | 41 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 700 | 4 |
| WI | 1 | 01 (85%) | 52 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 1174 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 8 | 08 (100%) | 43 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1580 | 6 |
| GA | 9 | 09 (68%) | 32 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 413 | 3 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| NC | 8 | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 365 | 2 | |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OH | 8 | 08 (64%) | 50 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 29 | 5 | 1280 | 5 |
| OH | 13 | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1890 | 6 | |
| OH | 15 | 52 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1442 | 5 | |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| MO | 5 | 05 (84%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 2574 | 7 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 | |
| SC | 2 | 02 (96%) | 49 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 33 | 6 | 642 | 3 |
| SC | 4 | 04 (97%) | 50 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1041 | 5 |
| VA | 2 | 02 (65%) | 54 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 39 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1363 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 5 | 05 (100%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 32 | 6 | 424 | 3 |
| AR | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 31 | 6 | 564 | 3 |
| FL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 42 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 960 | 5 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| NY | 26 | 26 (89%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 3694 | 8 |
| OH | 10 | 10 (90%) | 54 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 26 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1725 | 6 |
| TN | 7 | 07 (55%) | 42 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 450 | 3 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| CA | 5 | 44 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 921 | 4 | |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| OK | 4 | 04 (97%) | 34 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| TX | 13 | 13 (83%) | 35 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 389 | 2 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| IL | 8 | 08 (66%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 3634 | 8 |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NY | 11 | 11 (87%) | 66 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 46 | 7 | 36 | 7 | 19506 | 10 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| IL | 11 | 59 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 2011 | 7 | |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NE | 2 | 02 (97%) | 58 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 28 | 4 | 40 | 8 | 2541 | 7 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 2 | 48 | 36 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 1887 | 6 | |
| TX | 3 | 03 (76%) | 48 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 1833 | 6 |
| TX | 10 | 39 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 41 | 7 | 37 | 8 | 476 | 3 | |
| TX | 21 | 21 (76%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 42 | 9 | 783 | 4 |
| TX | 26 | 26 (74%) | 45 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 40 | 6 | 43 | 9 | 1462 | 6 |
| WA | 1 | 01 (65%) | 68 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 37 | 6 | 48 | 10 | 3514 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 7 | 03 (73%) | 50 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 1633 | 6 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| FL | 9 | 09 (71%) | 50 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 1843 | 6 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| FL | 27 | 27 (82%) | 61 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 83 | 10 | 39 | 8 | 9355 | 10 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 16 | 16 (94%) | 56 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 3295 | 8 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| TX | 34 | 34 (75%) | 50 | 62 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 90 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 1373 | 5 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 2 | 02 (93%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 210 | 1 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 4 | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 45 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1203 | 5 | |
| GA | 1 | 01 (97%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 369 | 2 |
| GA | 8 | 08 (81%) | 37 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 39 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 196 | 1 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| GA | 12 | 12 (85%) | 44 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 45 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 263 | 2 |
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| MS | 3 | 03 (91%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 26 | 3 | 160 | 1 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 | |
| SC | 2 | 02 (96%) | 49 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 33 | 6 | 642 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CO | 2 | 02 (78%) | 51 | 68 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 56 | 10 | 945 | 5 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| IN | 5 | 05 (75%) | 48 | 41 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 17 | 2 | 38 | 8 | 962 | 5 |
| MA | 9 | 09 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 15 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 948 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| PA | 17 | 17 (94%) | 50 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 16 | 2 | 41 | 8 | 1487 | 6 |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| IL | 8 | 08 (66%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 3634 | 8 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NY | 11 | 11 (87%) | 66 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 46 | 7 | 36 | 7 | 19506 | 10 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 5 | 05 (100%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 32 | 6 | 424 | 3 |
| AR | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 31 | 6 | 564 | 3 |
| FL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 42 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 960 | 5 |
| FL | 21 | 18 (98%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 32 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1723 | 6 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| MD | 1 | 01 (60%) | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 654 | 4 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| NY | 26 | 26 (89%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 3694 | 8 |
| OH | 10 | 10 (90%) | 54 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 26 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1725 | 6 |
| PA | 12 | 18 (86%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 38 | 8 | 3147 | 8 |
| TN | 7 | 07 (55%) | 42 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 450 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 8 | 08 (100%) | 43 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1580 | 6 |
| GA | 9 | 09 (68%) | 32 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 413 | 3 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OH | 8 | 08 (64%) | 50 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 29 | 5 | 1280 | 5 |
| OH | 13 | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1890 | 6 | |
| OH | 15 | 52 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1442 | 5 | |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| MI | 6 | 12 (57%) | 55 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 28 | 4 | 50 | 10 | 1839 | 6 |
| MI | 11 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 48 | 9 | 2921 | 7 | |
| MN | 3 | 03 (94%) | 61 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 49 | 10 | 2102 | 7 |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| NJ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 39 | 6 | 51 | 10 | 2656 | 7 |
| NY | 25 | 25 (94%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2171 | 7 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 1 | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 780 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CO | 2 | 02 (78%) | 51 | 68 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 56 | 10 | 945 | 5 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 30 | 28 (85%) | 67 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 43 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 11776 | 10 |
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| NY | 3 | 03 (64%) | 65 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 42 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 6713 | 9 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 13 | 16 (53%) | 49 | 55 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 74 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1174 | 5 |
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 25 | 36 (72%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 72 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 1538 | 6 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 10 | 11 (61%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 53 | 10 | 3109 | 8 |
| CA | 19 | 54 | 69 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 48 | 8 | 44 | 9 | 2303 | 7 | |
| CA | 30 | 28 (85%) | 67 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 43 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 11776 | 10 |
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 40 | 45 (64%) | 61 | 47 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 48 | 8 | 49 | 10 | 4390 | 8 |
| CA | 47 | 48 (63%) | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 7 | 56 | 10 | 6215 | 9 |
| CA | 51 | 53 (51%) | 64 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 6383 | 9 |
| NY | 3 | 03 (64%) | 65 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 42 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 6713 | 9 |
| WA | 9 | 09 (84%) | 77 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 39 | 8 | 4982 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 11 | 12 (92%) | 70 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 63 | 10 | 26597 | 10 |
| CA | 16 | 18 (69%) | 66 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 61 | 10 | 5440 | 9 |
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| NY | 10 | 71 | 87 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 59 | 10 | 66619 | 10 | |
| NY | 12 | 12 (60%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 79 | 10 | 102616 | 10 |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| VA | 11 | 11 (68%) | 64 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 66 | 10 | 4091 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 12 | 13 (100%) | 72 | 91 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 11703 | 10 |
| FL | 10 | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 34 | 7 | 3966 | 8 | |
| FL | 25 | 23 (78%) | 57 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 66 | 9 | 37 | 8 | 4880 | 9 |
| GA | 7 | 07 (58%) | 66 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2798 | 7 |
| MA | 7 | 07 (97%) | 82 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 47 | 9 | 19932 | 10 |
| NJ | 8 | 08 (93%) | 69 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 26364 | 10 |
| NY | 7 | 71 | 84 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 53502 | 10 | |
| NY | 16 | 16 (75%) | 72 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 10107 | 10 |
| TX | 7 | 63 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 48 | 10 | 7491 | 9 | |
| TX | 32 | 61 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 6418 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 14 | 15 (86%) | 67 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 5491 | 9 |
| CA | 15 | 14 (82%) | 70 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 47 | 9 | 10116 | 10 |
| CA | 17 | 17 (90%) | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 77 | 10 | 59 | 10 | 7865 | 9 |
| CA | 28 | 27 (87%) | 67 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 45 | 9 | 6661 | 9 |
| CA | 45 | 66 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 72 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 8207 | 10 | |
| HI | 1 | 01 (100%) | 63 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 37 | 7 | 8541 | 10 |
| HI | 2 | 02 (99%) | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 68 | 9 | 30 | 5 | 808 | 4 |
| NY | 6 | 06 (81%) | 72 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 75 | 10 | 37 | 8 | 42610 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 14 | 15 (86%) | 67 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 5491 | 9 |
| CA | 15 | 14 (82%) | 70 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 47 | 9 | 10116 | 10 |
| CA | 17 | 17 (90%) | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 77 | 10 | 59 | 10 | 7865 | 9 |
| CA | 28 | 27 (87%) | 67 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 45 | 9 | 6661 | 9 |
| CA | 45 | 66 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 72 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 8207 | 10 | |
| HI | 1 | 01 (100%) | 63 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 37 | 7 | 8541 | 10 |
| HI | 2 | 02 (99%) | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 68 | 9 | 30 | 5 | 808 | 4 |
| NY | 6 | 06 (81%) | 72 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 75 | 10 | 37 | 8 | 42610 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 11 | 12 (92%) | 70 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 63 | 10 | 26597 | 10 |
| CA | 16 | 18 (69%) | 66 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 61 | 10 | 5440 | 9 |
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| NY | 10 | 71 | 87 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 59 | 10 | 66619 | 10 | |
| NY | 12 | 12 (60%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 79 | 10 | 102616 | 10 |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| VA | 11 | 11 (68%) | 64 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 66 | 10 | 4091 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 14 | 15 (86%) | 67 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 5491 | 9 |
| CA | 15 | 14 (82%) | 70 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 47 | 9 | 10116 | 10 |
| CA | 17 | 17 (90%) | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 77 | 10 | 59 | 10 | 7865 | 9 |
| CA | 28 | 27 (87%) | 67 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 45 | 9 | 6661 | 9 |
| CA | 45 | 66 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 72 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 8207 | 10 | |
| HI | 1 | 01 (100%) | 63 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 37 | 7 | 8541 | 10 |
| NY | 6 | 06 (81%) | 72 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 75 | 10 | 37 | 8 | 42610 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 13 | 16 (53%) | 49 | 55 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 74 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1174 | 5 |
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 31 | 32 (92%) | 65 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 7881 | 9 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 38 | 38 (63%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 6992 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 13 | 16 (53%) | 49 | 55 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 74 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1174 | 5 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 25 | 36 (72%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 72 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 1538 | 6 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 16 | 16 (94%) | 56 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 3295 | 8 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 24 | 24 (85%) | 56 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 46 | 7 | 37 | 7 | 2496 | 7 |
| CA | 26 | 26 (80%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 3116 | 8 |
| IL | 3 | 69 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 57 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 9512 | 10 | |
| NM | 1 | 01 (74%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 51 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 1672 | 6 |
| TX | 22 | 22 (75%) | 49 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 55 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 1362 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 24 | 24 (85%) | 56 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 46 | 7 | 37 | 7 | 2496 | 7 |
| CA | 26 | 26 (80%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 3116 | 8 |
| IL | 3 | 69 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 57 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 9512 | 10 | |
| NM | 1 | 01 (74%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 51 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 1672 | 6 |
| TX | 22 | 22 (75%) | 49 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 55 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 1362 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 7 | 03 (73%) | 50 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 1633 | 6 |
| CA | 7 | 06 (56%) | 63 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 4527 | 8 |
| CA | 8 | 64 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 4073 | 8 | |
| CA | 9 | 09 (75%) | 57 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 3261 | 8 |
| CA | 27 | 25 (80%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 2692 | 7 |
| FL | 9 | 09 (71%) | 50 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 1843 | 6 |
| IL | 3 | 69 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 57 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 9512 | 10 | |
| NJ | 9 | 09 (83%) | 66 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 10010 | 10 |
| NM | 2 | 02 (73%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 364 | 2 |
| NM | 3 | 03 (81%) | 47 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 62 | 9 | 24 | 3 | 119 | 1 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 14 | 15 (86%) | 67 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 5491 | 9 |
| CA | 15 | 14 (82%) | 70 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 47 | 9 | 10116 | 10 |
| CA | 17 | 17 (90%) | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 77 | 10 | 59 | 10 | 7865 | 9 |
| CA | 28 | 27 (87%) | 67 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 45 | 9 | 6661 | 9 |
| CA | 45 | 66 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 72 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 8207 | 10 | |
| HI | 1 | 01 (100%) | 63 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 37 | 7 | 8541 | 10 |
| HI | 2 | 02 (99%) | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 68 | 9 | 30 | 5 | 808 | 4 |
| NY | 6 | 06 (81%) | 72 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 75 | 10 | 37 | 8 | 42610 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 13 | 16 (53%) | 49 | 55 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 74 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1174 | 5 |
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 25 | 36 (72%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 72 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 1538 | 6 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 31 | 32 (92%) | 65 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 7881 | 9 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 38 | 38 (63%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 6992 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 10 | 11 (61%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 53 | 10 | 3109 | 8 |
| CA | 19 | 54 | 69 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 48 | 8 | 44 | 9 | 2303 | 7 | |
| CA | 30 | 28 (85%) | 67 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 43 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 11776 | 10 |
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 40 | 45 (64%) | 61 | 47 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 48 | 8 | 49 | 10 | 4390 | 8 |
| CA | 47 | 48 (63%) | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 7 | 56 | 10 | 6215 | 9 |
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CA | 51 | 53 (51%) | 64 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 6383 | 9 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NY | 3 | 03 (64%) | 65 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 42 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 6713 | 9 |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 31 | 32 (92%) | 65 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 7881 | 9 |
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 38 | 38 (63%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 6992 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 10 | 11 (61%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 53 | 10 | 3109 | 8 |
| CA | 19 | 54 | 69 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 48 | 8 | 44 | 9 | 2303 | 7 | |
| CA | 30 | 28 (85%) | 67 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 43 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 11776 | 10 |
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 40 | 45 (64%) | 61 | 47 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 48 | 8 | 49 | 10 | 4390 | 8 |
| CA | 47 | 48 (63%) | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 7 | 56 | 10 | 6215 | 9 |
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NY | 3 | 03 (64%) | 65 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 42 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 6713 | 9 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 13 | 16 (53%) | 49 | 55 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 74 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1174 | 5 |
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 25 | 36 (72%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 72 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 1538 | 6 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 31 | 32 (92%) | 65 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 7881 | 9 |
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 37 | 37 (69%) | 74 | 89 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 17265 | 10 |
| CA | 38 | 38 (63%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 6992 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| NY | 13 | 13 (89%) | 78 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 33 | 6 | 97549 | 10 |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 13 | 16 (53%) | 49 | 55 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 74 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1174 | 5 |
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 25 | 36 (72%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 72 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 1538 | 6 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 31 | 32 (92%) | 65 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 7881 | 9 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 37 | 37 (69%) | 74 | 89 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 17265 | 10 |
| CA | 38 | 38 (63%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 6992 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 43 | 43 (72%) | 74 | 85 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 92 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 13830 | 10 |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| NY | 13 | 13 (89%) | 78 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 33 | 6 | 97549 | 10 |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 11 | 12 (92%) | 70 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 63 | 10 | 26597 | 10 |
| CA | 16 | 18 (69%) | 66 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 61 | 10 | 5440 | 9 |
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| NY | 10 | 71 | 87 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 59 | 10 | 66619 | 10 | |
| NY | 12 | 12 (60%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 79 | 10 | 102616 | 10 |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| VA | 11 | 11 (68%) | 64 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 66 | 10 | 4091 | 8 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 37 | 37 (69%) | 74 | 89 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 17265 | 10 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 43 | 43 (72%) | 74 | 85 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 92 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 13830 | 10 |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| NY | 13 | 13 (89%) | 78 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 33 | 6 | 97549 | 10 |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| NY | 15 | 15 (64%) | 79 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 65351 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 31 | 32 (92%) | 65 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 7881 | 9 |
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 38 | 38 (63%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 6992 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 13 | 16 (53%) | 49 | 55 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 74 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1174 | 5 |
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 25 | 36 (72%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 72 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 1538 | 6 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 31 | 32 (92%) | 65 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 7881 | 9 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 37 | 37 (69%) | 74 | 89 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 17265 | 10 |
| CA | 38 | 38 (63%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 6992 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 43 | 43 (72%) | 74 | 85 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 92 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 13830 | 10 |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 13 | 16 (53%) | 49 | 55 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 74 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1174 | 5 |
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 25 | 36 (72%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 72 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 1538 | 6 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 31 | 32 (92%) | 65 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 7881 | 9 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 38 | 38 (63%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 6992 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 37 | 37 (69%) | 74 | 89 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 17265 | 10 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 43 | 43 (72%) | 74 | 85 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 92 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 13830 | 10 |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| NY | 13 | 13 (89%) | 78 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 33 | 6 | 97549 | 10 |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| NY | 15 | 15 (64%) | 79 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 65351 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 31 | 32 (92%) | 65 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 7881 | 9 |
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 37 | 37 (69%) | 74 | 89 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 17265 | 10 |
| CA | 38 | 38 (63%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 6992 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 43 | 43 (72%) | 74 | 85 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 92 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 13830 | 10 |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| NY | 13 | 13 (89%) | 78 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 33 | 6 | 97549 | 10 |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| NY | 15 | 15 (64%) | 79 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 65351 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 31 | 32 (92%) | 65 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 7881 | 9 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 38 | 38 (63%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 6992 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 10 | 11 (61%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 53 | 10 | 3109 | 8 |
| CA | 19 | 54 | 69 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 48 | 8 | 44 | 9 | 2303 | 7 | |
| CA | 30 | 28 (85%) | 67 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 43 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 11776 | 10 |
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 40 | 45 (64%) | 61 | 47 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 48 | 8 | 49 | 10 | 4390 | 8 |
| CA | 47 | 48 (63%) | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 7 | 56 | 10 | 6215 | 9 |
| CA | 51 | 53 (51%) | 64 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 6383 | 9 |
| NY | 3 | 03 (64%) | 65 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 42 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 6713 | 9 |
| WA | 9 | 09 (84%) | 77 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 39 | 8 | 4982 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 11 | 12 (92%) | 70 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 63 | 10 | 26597 | 10 |
| CA | 16 | 18 (69%) | 66 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 61 | 10 | 5440 | 9 |
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CO | 2 | 02 (78%) | 51 | 68 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 56 | 10 | 945 | 5 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| NY | 10 | 71 | 87 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 59 | 10 | 66619 | 10 | |
| NY | 12 | 12 (60%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 79 | 10 | 102616 | 10 |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| VA | 11 | 11 (68%) | 64 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 66 | 10 | 4091 | 8 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 10 | 11 (61%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 53 | 10 | 3109 | 8 |
| CA | 19 | 54 | 69 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 48 | 8 | 44 | 9 | 2303 | 7 | |
| CA | 30 | 28 (85%) | 67 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 43 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 11776 | 10 |
| CA | 40 | 45 (64%) | 61 | 47 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 48 | 8 | 49 | 10 | 4390 | 8 |
| CA | 47 | 48 (63%) | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 7 | 56 | 10 | 6215 | 9 |
| CA | 51 | 53 (51%) | 64 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 6383 | 9 |
| NJ | 6 | 06 (89%) | 63 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 40 | 8 | 5104 | 9 |
| NJ | 12 | 12 (87%) | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 48 | 10 | 2928 | 7 |
| NY | 3 | 03 (64%) | 65 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 42 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 6713 | 9 |
| TX | 22 | 22 (75%) | 49 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 55 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 1362 | 5 |
| WA | 9 | 09 (84%) | 77 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 39 | 8 | 4982 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 13 | 16 (53%) | 49 | 55 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 74 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1174 | 5 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 25 | 36 (72%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 72 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 1538 | 6 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| FL | 27 | 27 (82%) | 61 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 83 | 10 | 39 | 8 | 9355 | 10 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 16 | 16 (94%) | 56 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 3295 | 8 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| TX | 34 | 34 (75%) | 50 | 62 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 90 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 1373 | 5 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| IL | 8 | 08 (66%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 3634 | 8 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NV | 4 | 04 (83%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 58 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 2417 | 7 |
| NY | 11 | 11 (87%) | 66 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 46 | 7 | 36 | 7 | 19506 | 10 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 11 | 11 (75%) | 44 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 52 | 8 | 22 | 2 | 892 | 4 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 7 | 06 (56%) | 63 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 4527 | 8 |
| CA | 8 | 64 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 4073 | 8 | |
| CA | 9 | 09 (75%) | 57 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 3261 | 8 |
| CA | 27 | 25 (80%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 2692 | 7 |
| FL | 9 | 09 (71%) | 50 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 1843 | 6 |
| HI | 1 | 01 (100%) | 63 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 37 | 7 | 8541 | 10 |
| HI | 2 | 02 (99%) | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 68 | 9 | 30 | 5 | 808 | 4 |
| IL | 3 | 69 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 57 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 9512 | 10 | |
| NJ | 9 | 09 (83%) | 66 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 10010 | 10 |
| NY | 6 | 06 (81%) | 72 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 75 | 10 | 37 | 8 | 42610 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 7 | 06 (56%) | 63 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 4527 | 8 |
| CA | 8 | 64 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 4073 | 8 | |
| CA | 9 | 09 (75%) | 57 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 3261 | 8 |
| CA | 27 | 25 (80%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 2692 | 7 |
| FL | 9 | 09 (71%) | 50 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 1843 | 6 |
| HI | 1 | 01 (100%) | 63 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 37 | 7 | 8541 | 10 |
| HI | 2 | 02 (99%) | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 68 | 9 | 30 | 5 | 808 | 4 |
| IL | 3 | 69 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 57 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 9512 | 10 | |
| NJ | 9 | 09 (83%) | 66 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 10010 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 7 | 03 (73%) | 50 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 1633 | 6 |
| CA | 7 | 06 (56%) | 63 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 4527 | 8 |
| CA | 8 | 64 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 4073 | 8 | |
| CA | 9 | 09 (75%) | 57 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 3261 | 8 |
| CA | 27 | 25 (80%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 2692 | 7 |
| FL | 9 | 09 (71%) | 50 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 1843 | 6 |
| HI | 2 | 02 (99%) | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 68 | 9 | 30 | 5 | 808 | 4 |
| IL | 3 | 69 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 57 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 9512 | 10 | |
| NJ | 9 | 09 (83%) | 66 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 10010 | 10 |
| NM | 2 | 02 (73%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 364 | 2 |
| NM | 3 | 03 (81%) | 47 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 62 | 9 | 24 | 3 | 119 | 1 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 11 | 12 (92%) | 70 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 63 | 10 | 26597 | 10 |
| CA | 16 | 18 (69%) | 66 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 61 | 10 | 5440 | 9 |
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| NY | 10 | 71 | 87 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 59 | 10 | 66619 | 10 | |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| VA | 11 | 11 (68%) | 64 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 66 | 10 | 4091 | 8 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 30 | 28 (85%) | 67 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 43 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 11776 | 10 |
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| IL | 11 | 59 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 2011 | 7 | |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NE | 2 | 02 (97%) | 58 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 28 | 4 | 40 | 8 | 2541 | 7 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 3 | 03 (76%) | 48 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 1833 | 6 |
| TX | 21 | 21 (76%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 42 | 9 | 783 | 4 |
| TX | 26 | 26 (74%) | 45 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 40 | 6 | 43 | 9 | 1462 | 6 |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| WA | 1 | 01 (65%) | 68 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 37 | 6 | 48 | 10 | 3514 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 6 | 06 (90%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 593 | 3 |
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| OH | 3 | 03 (67%) | 69 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 43 | 9 | 4662 | 9 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 7 | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 46 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 1036 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 6 | 06 (90%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 593 | 3 |
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| NY | 25 | 25 (94%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2171 | 7 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 7 | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 46 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 1036 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 16 | 18 (69%) | 66 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 61 | 10 | 5440 | 9 |
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| VA | 11 | 11 (68%) | 64 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 66 | 10 | 4091 | 8 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 12 | 13 (100%) | 72 | 91 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 11703 | 10 |
| FL | 10 | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 34 | 7 | 3966 | 8 | |
| FL | 25 | 23 (78%) | 57 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 66 | 9 | 37 | 8 | 4880 | 9 |
| GA | 7 | 07 (58%) | 66 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2798 | 7 |
| IN | 7 | 07 (74%) | 64 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 33 | 6 | 3268 | 8 |
| MA | 7 | 07 (97%) | 82 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 47 | 9 | 19932 | 10 |
| NC | 12 | 12 (72%) | 67 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 2038 | 7 |
| NY | 16 | 16 (75%) | 72 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 10107 | 10 |
| PA | 2 | 02 (96%) | 72 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 25 | 3 | 15355 | 10 |
| TX | 7 | 63 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 48 | 10 | 7491 | 9 | |
| TX | 32 | 61 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 6418 | 9 | |
| WI | 4 | 04 (88%) | 71 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 31 | 6 | 7033 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 14 | 14 (67%) | 57 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 36 | 7 | 4041 | 8 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| NC | 4 | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 42 | 8 | 886 | 4 | |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NY | 4 | 04 (84%) | 68 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 8 | 42 | 9 | 8189 | 9 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| OH | 3 | 03 (67%) | 69 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 43 | 9 | 4662 | 9 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| VA | 7 | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 46 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 1036 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| TX | 9 | 09 (65%) | 69 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 4853 | 9 |
| TX | 18 | 18 (77%) | 66 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 26 | 3 | 4434 | 8 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| TX | 9 | 09 (65%) | 69 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 4853 | 9 |
| TX | 18 | 18 (77%) | 66 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 26 | 3 | 4434 | 8 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 12 | 13 (100%) | 72 | 91 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 11703 | 10 |
| FL | 10 | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 34 | 7 | 3966 | 8 | |
| FL | 25 | 23 (78%) | 57 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 66 | 9 | 37 | 8 | 4880 | 9 |
| GA | 7 | 07 (58%) | 66 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2798 | 7 |
| IN | 7 | 07 (74%) | 64 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 33 | 6 | 3268 | 8 |
| MA | 7 | 07 (97%) | 82 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 47 | 9 | 19932 | 10 |
| NC | 12 | 12 (72%) | 67 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 2038 | 7 |
| NY | 16 | 16 (75%) | 72 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 10107 | 10 |
| PA | 2 | 02 (96%) | 72 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 25 | 3 | 15355 | 10 |
| TX | 7 | 63 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 48 | 10 | 7491 | 9 | |
| TX | 32 | 61 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 6418 | 9 | |
| WI | 4 | 04 (88%) | 71 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 31 | 6 | 7033 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 5 | 05 (86%) | 74 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 4065 | 8 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| TX | 9 | 09 (65%) | 69 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 4853 | 9 |
| TX | 18 | 18 (77%) | 66 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 26 | 3 | 4434 | 8 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 5 | 05 (86%) | 74 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 4065 | 8 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| TX | 9 | 09 (65%) | 69 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 4853 | 9 |
| TX | 18 | 18 (77%) | 66 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 26 | 3 | 4434 | 8 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 5 | 05 (86%) | 74 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 4065 | 8 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 12 | 13 (100%) | 72 | 91 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 11703 | 10 |
| FL | 10 | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 34 | 7 | 3966 | 8 | |
| FL | 25 | 23 (78%) | 57 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 66 | 9 | 37 | 8 | 4880 | 9 |
| GA | 7 | 07 (58%) | 66 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2798 | 7 |
| IN | 7 | 07 (74%) | 64 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 33 | 6 | 3268 | 8 |
| MA | 7 | 07 (97%) | 82 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 47 | 9 | 19932 | 10 |
| NC | 12 | 12 (72%) | 67 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 2038 | 7 |
| NY | 16 | 16 (75%) | 72 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 10107 | 10 |
| PA | 2 | 02 (96%) | 72 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 25 | 3 | 15355 | 10 |
| TX | 7 | 63 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 48 | 10 | 7491 | 9 | |
| TX | 32 | 61 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 6418 | 9 | |
| WI | 4 | 04 (88%) | 71 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 31 | 6 | 7033 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 7 | 06 (56%) | 63 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 4527 | 8 |
| CA | 8 | 64 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 4073 | 8 | |
| CA | 14 | 15 (86%) | 67 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 5491 | 9 |
| CA | 15 | 14 (82%) | 70 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 47 | 9 | 10116 | 10 |
| CA | 17 | 17 (90%) | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 77 | 10 | 59 | 10 | 7865 | 9 |
| CA | 28 | 27 (87%) | 67 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 45 | 9 | 6661 | 9 |
| CA | 45 | 66 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 72 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 8207 | 10 | |
| HI | 1 | 01 (100%) | 63 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 37 | 7 | 8541 | 10 |
| HI | 2 | 02 (99%) | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 68 | 9 | 30 | 5 | 808 | 4 |
| NY | 6 | 06 (81%) | 72 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 75 | 10 | 37 | 8 | 42610 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 7 | 06 (56%) | 63 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 4527 | 8 |
| CA | 8 | 64 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 4073 | 8 | |
| CA | 9 | 09 (75%) | 57 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 3261 | 8 |
| CA | 14 | 15 (86%) | 67 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 5491 | 9 |
| CA | 15 | 14 (82%) | 70 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 47 | 9 | 10116 | 10 |
| CA | 28 | 27 (87%) | 67 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 45 | 9 | 6661 | 9 |
| CA | 45 | 66 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 72 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 8207 | 10 | |
| HI | 1 | 01 (100%) | 63 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 37 | 7 | 8541 | 10 |
| HI | 2 | 02 (99%) | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 68 | 9 | 30 | 5 | 808 | 4 |
| NY | 6 | 06 (81%) | 72 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 75 | 10 | 37 | 8 | 42610 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 5 | 05 (92%) | 64 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 1098 | 5 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| IL | 11 | 59 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 2011 | 7 | |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NE | 2 | 02 (97%) | 58 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 28 | 4 | 40 | 8 | 2541 | 7 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 3 | 03 (76%) | 48 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 1833 | 6 |
| TX | 21 | 21 (76%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 42 | 9 | 783 | 4 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 26 | 26 (74%) | 45 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 40 | 6 | 43 | 9 | 1462 | 6 |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| WA | 1 | 01 (65%) | 68 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 37 | 6 | 48 | 10 | 3514 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| IL | 11 | 59 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 2011 | 7 | |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NE | 2 | 02 (97%) | 58 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 28 | 4 | 40 | 8 | 2541 | 7 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 3 | 03 (76%) | 48 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 1833 | 6 |
| TX | 21 | 21 (76%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 42 | 9 | 783 | 4 |
| TX | 26 | 26 (74%) | 45 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 40 | 6 | 43 | 9 | 1462 | 6 |
| WA | 1 | 01 (65%) | 68 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 37 | 6 | 48 | 10 | 3514 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AR | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 31 | 6 | 564 | 3 |
| FL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 42 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 960 | 5 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| NY | 26 | 26 (89%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 3694 | 8 |
| OH | 10 | 10 (90%) | 54 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 26 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1725 | 6 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| TN | 7 | 07 (55%) | 42 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 450 | 3 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| MD | 5 | 05 (92%) | 64 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 1098 | 5 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 7 | 03 (73%) | 50 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 1633 | 6 |
| CA | 7 | 06 (56%) | 63 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 4527 | 8 |
| CA | 8 | 64 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 4073 | 8 | |
| CA | 9 | 09 (75%) | 57 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 3261 | 8 |
| CA | 24 | 24 (85%) | 56 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 46 | 7 | 37 | 7 | 2496 | 7 |
| CA | 26 | 26 (80%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 3116 | 8 |
| CA | 27 | 25 (80%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 2692 | 7 |
| FL | 9 | 09 (71%) | 50 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 1843 | 6 |
| IL | 3 | 69 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 57 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 9512 | 10 | |
| NJ | 9 | 09 (83%) | 66 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 10010 | 10 |
| NM | 1 | 01 (74%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 51 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 1672 | 6 |
| NM | 2 | 02 (73%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 364 | 2 |
| NM | 3 | 03 (81%) | 47 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 62 | 9 | 24 | 3 | 119 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 13 | 16 (53%) | 49 | 55 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 74 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1174 | 5 |
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 25 | 36 (72%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 72 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 1538 | 6 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 31 | 32 (92%) | 65 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 7881 | 9 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 38 | 38 (63%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 6992 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 2 | 02 (78%) | 51 | 68 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 56 | 10 | 945 | 5 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| NY | 12 | 12 (60%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 79 | 10 | 102616 | 10 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 6 | 02 (69%) | 42 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 36 | 7 | 821 | 4 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| CT | 5 | 05 (99%) | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 33 | 5 | 37 | 7 | 1228 | 5 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 3 | 03 (96%) | 62 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 38 | 8 | 1905 | 6 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| NY | 20 | 20 (88%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 40 | 8 | 1559 | 6 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 5 | 05 (86%) | 74 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 4065 | 8 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| IL | 8 | 08 (66%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 3634 | 8 |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NY | 11 | 11 (87%) | 66 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 46 | 7 | 36 | 7 | 19506 | 10 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CO | 2 | 02 (78%) | 51 | 68 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 56 | 10 | 945 | 5 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 10 | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 34 | 7 | 3966 | 8 | |
| FL | 25 | 23 (78%) | 57 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 66 | 9 | 37 | 8 | 4880 | 9 |
| GA | 7 | 07 (58%) | 66 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2798 | 7 |
| IN | 7 | 07 (74%) | 64 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 33 | 6 | 3268 | 8 |
| NC | 12 | 12 (72%) | 67 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 2038 | 7 |
| PA | 2 | 02 (96%) | 72 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 25 | 3 | 15355 | 10 |
| TX | 32 | 61 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 6418 | 9 | |
| WI | 4 | 04 (88%) | 71 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 31 | 6 | 7033 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 5 | 05 (100%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 32 | 6 | 424 | 3 |
| AR | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 31 | 6 | 564 | 3 |
| FL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 42 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 960 | 5 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| NY | 26 | 26 (89%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 3694 | 8 |
| OH | 10 | 10 (90%) | 54 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 26 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1725 | 6 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| TN | 7 | 07 (55%) | 42 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 450 | 3 |
| VA | 2 | 02 (65%) | 54 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 39 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1363 | 5 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 1 | 06 (74%) | 50 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 3134 | 8 |
| AZ | 6 | 02 (69%) | 42 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 36 | 7 | 821 | 4 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| KS | 3 | 03 (92%) | 53 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 1711 | 6 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 4 | 04 (89%) | 62 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 19 | 2 | 46 | 9 | 2044 | 7 |
| MA | 6 | 06 (96%) | 66 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 20 | 3 | 47 | 9 | 2347 | 7 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| MO | 2 | 02 (71%) | 49 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 14 | 2 | 47 | 9 | 1452 | 6 |
| NJ | 7 | 07 (72%) | 46 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 1071 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| NY | 20 | 20 (88%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 40 | 8 | 1559 | 6 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 6 | 02 (69%) | 42 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 36 | 7 | 821 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CT | 5 | 05 (99%) | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 33 | 5 | 37 | 7 | 1228 | 5 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| MA | 3 | 03 (96%) | 62 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 38 | 8 | 1905 | 6 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| NY | 20 | 20 (88%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 40 | 8 | 1559 | 6 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 1 | 06 (74%) | 50 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 3134 | 8 |
| KS | 3 | 03 (92%) | 53 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 1711 | 6 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 4 | 04 (89%) | 62 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 19 | 2 | 46 | 9 | 2044 | 7 |
| MA | 6 | 06 (96%) | 66 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 20 | 3 | 47 | 9 | 2347 | 7 |
| MD | 6 | 06 (89%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 1042 | 5 |
| MO | 2 | 02 (71%) | 49 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 14 | 2 | 47 | 9 | 1452 | 6 |
| NJ | 7 | 07 (72%) | 46 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 1071 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CO | 2 | 02 (78%) | 51 | 68 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 56 | 10 | 945 | 5 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| NY | 12 | 12 (60%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 79 | 10 | 102616 | 10 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 1 | 06 (74%) | 50 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 3134 | 8 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| KS | 3 | 03 (92%) | 53 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 50 | 10 | 1711 | 6 |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 4 | 04 (89%) | 62 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 19 | 2 | 46 | 9 | 2044 | 7 |
| MA | 6 | 06 (96%) | 66 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 20 | 3 | 47 | 9 | 2347 | 7 |
| MO | 2 | 02 (71%) | 49 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 14 | 2 | 47 | 9 | 1452 | 6 |
| NJ | 7 | 07 (72%) | 46 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 1071 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 12 | 13 (100%) | 72 | 91 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 11703 | 10 |
| FL | 10 | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 34 | 7 | 3966 | 8 | |
| FL | 25 | 23 (78%) | 57 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 66 | 9 | 37 | 8 | 4880 | 9 |
| GA | 7 | 07 (58%) | 66 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2798 | 7 |
| MA | 7 | 07 (97%) | 82 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 47 | 9 | 19932 | 10 |
| NC | 12 | 12 (72%) | 67 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 2038 | 7 |
| NJ | 8 | 08 (93%) | 69 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 26364 | 10 |
| NY | 7 | 71 | 84 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 53502 | 10 | |
| NY | 16 | 16 (75%) | 72 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 10107 | 10 |
| TX | 7 | 63 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 48 | 10 | 7491 | 9 | |
| TX | 32 | 61 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 6418 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 75 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 4559 | 8 |
| MI | 6 | 12 (57%) | 55 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 28 | 4 | 50 | 10 | 1839 | 6 |
| MI | 11 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 48 | 9 | 2921 | 7 | |
| MN | 3 | 03 (94%) | 61 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 49 | 10 | 2102 | 7 |
| MN | 4 | 04 (100%) | 65 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 3319 | 8 |
| NJ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 39 | 6 | 51 | 10 | 2656 | 7 |
| VA | 1 | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 780 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 2 | 02 (93%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 210 | 1 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 4 | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 45 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1203 | 5 | |
| GA | 1 | 01 (97%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 369 | 2 |
| GA | 8 | 08 (81%) | 37 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 39 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 196 | 1 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| MO | 5 | 05 (84%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 2574 | 7 |
| MS | 3 | 03 (91%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 26 | 3 | 160 | 1 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 | |
| SC | 2 | 02 (96%) | 49 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 33 | 6 | 642 | 3 |
| SC | 4 | 04 (97%) | 50 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1041 | 5 |
| VA | 2 | 02 (65%) | 54 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 39 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1363 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 2 | 02 (78%) | 51 | 68 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 56 | 10 | 945 | 5 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 5 | 05 (86%) | 74 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 4065 | 8 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| MD | 5 | 05 (92%) | 64 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 1098 | 5 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 5 | 05 (86%) | 74 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 4065 | 8 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | 2 | 02 (78%) | 51 | 68 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 56 | 10 | 945 | 5 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| MA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 75 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 4559 | 8 |
| MI | 6 | 12 (57%) | 55 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 28 | 4 | 50 | 10 | 1839 | 6 |
| MI | 11 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 48 | 9 | 2921 | 7 | |
| MN | 3 | 03 (94%) | 61 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 49 | 10 | 2102 | 7 |
| MN | 4 | 04 (100%) | 65 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 3319 | 8 |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| NJ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 39 | 6 | 51 | 10 | 2656 | 7 |
| NY | 25 | 25 (94%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2171 | 7 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 1 | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 780 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| MD | 5 | 05 (92%) | 64 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 1098 | 5 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| MD | 5 | 05 (92%) | 64 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 1098 | 5 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 75 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 4559 | 8 |
| MI | 6 | 12 (57%) | 55 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 28 | 4 | 50 | 10 | 1839 | 6 |
| MI | 11 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 48 | 9 | 2921 | 7 | |
| MN | 3 | 03 (94%) | 61 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 49 | 10 | 2102 | 7 |
| MN | 4 | 04 (100%) | 65 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 3319 | 8 |
| NJ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 39 | 6 | 51 | 10 | 2656 | 7 |
| NY | 25 | 25 (94%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2171 | 7 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 1 | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 780 | 4 | |
| WA | 1 | 01 (65%) | 68 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 37 | 6 | 48 | 10 | 3514 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 75 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 49 | 10 | 4559 | 8 |
| MI | 6 | 12 (57%) | 55 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 28 | 4 | 50 | 10 | 1839 | 6 |
| MI | 11 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 48 | 9 | 2921 | 7 | |
| MN | 3 | 03 (94%) | 61 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 49 | 10 | 2102 | 7 |
| MN | 4 | 04 (100%) | 65 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 3319 | 8 |
| NJ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 39 | 6 | 51 | 10 | 2656 | 7 |
| VA | 1 | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 780 | 4 | |
| WA | 1 | 01 (65%) | 68 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 37 | 6 | 48 | 10 | 3514 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| IL | 11 | 59 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 2011 | 7 | |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| WA | 1 | 01 (65%) | 68 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 37 | 6 | 48 | 10 | 3514 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| MD | 5 | 05 (92%) | 64 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 1098 | 5 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| MO | 5 | 05 (84%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 2574 | 7 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 | |
| SC | 2 | 02 (96%) | 49 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 33 | 6 | 642 | 3 |
| SC | 4 | 04 (97%) | 50 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1041 | 5 |
| VA | 2 | 02 (65%) | 54 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 39 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1363 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 10 | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 34 | 7 | 3966 | 8 | |
| FL | 25 | 23 (78%) | 57 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 66 | 9 | 37 | 8 | 4880 | 9 |
| GA | 7 | 07 (58%) | 66 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2798 | 7 |
| IN | 7 | 07 (74%) | 64 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 33 | 6 | 3268 | 8 |
| MA | 7 | 07 (97%) | 82 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 47 | 9 | 19932 | 10 |
| NC | 12 | 12 (72%) | 67 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 2038 | 7 |
| NY | 16 | 16 (75%) | 72 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 10107 | 10 |
| PA | 2 | 02 (96%) | 72 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 25 | 3 | 15355 | 10 |
| TX | 32 | 61 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 6418 | 9 | |
| WI | 4 | 04 (88%) | 71 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 31 | 6 | 7033 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 14 | 14 (67%) | 57 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 36 | 7 | 4041 | 8 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| NC | 4 | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 42 | 8 | 886 | 4 | |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NE | 2 | 02 (97%) | 58 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 28 | 4 | 40 | 8 | 2541 | 7 |
| NY | 4 | 04 (84%) | 68 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 8 | 42 | 9 | 8189 | 9 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| OH | 3 | 03 (67%) | 69 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 43 | 9 | 4662 | 9 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 30 | 28 (85%) | 67 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 43 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 11776 | 10 |
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| VA | 11 | 11 (68%) | 64 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 66 | 10 | 4091 | 8 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 14 | 14 (67%) | 57 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 36 | 7 | 4041 | 8 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| NC | 4 | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 42 | 8 | 886 | 4 | |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NY | 4 | 04 (84%) | 68 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 8 | 42 | 9 | 8189 | 9 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| OH | 3 | 03 (67%) | 69 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 43 | 9 | 4662 | 9 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| VA | 7 | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 46 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 1036 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 2 | 02 (93%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 210 | 1 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 4 | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 45 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1203 | 5 | |
| GA | 1 | 01 (97%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 369 | 2 |
| GA | 8 | 08 (81%) | 37 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 39 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 196 | 1 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| GA | 12 | 12 (85%) | 44 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 45 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 263 | 2 |
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| MO | 5 | 05 (84%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 2574 | 7 |
| MS | 3 | 03 (91%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 26 | 3 | 160 | 1 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 | |
| SC | 2 | 02 (96%) | 49 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 33 | 6 | 642 | 3 |
| SC | 4 | 04 (97%) | 50 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1041 | 5 |
| VA | 2 | 02 (65%) | 54 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 39 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1363 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 5 | 05 (86%) | 74 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 4065 | 8 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| TX | 9 | 09 (65%) | 69 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 4853 | 9 |
| TX | 18 | 18 (77%) | 66 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 26 | 3 | 4434 | 8 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 19 | 54 | 69 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 48 | 8 | 44 | 9 | 2303 | 7 | |
| CA | 40 | 45 (64%) | 61 | 47 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 48 | 8 | 49 | 10 | 4390 | 8 |
| CA | 51 | 53 (51%) | 64 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 6383 | 9 |
| NJ | 6 | 06 (89%) | 63 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 40 | 8 | 5104 | 9 |
| NJ | 12 | 12 (87%) | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 48 | 10 | 2928 | 7 |
| NY | 3 | 03 (64%) | 65 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 42 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 6713 | 9 |
| TX | 22 | 22 (75%) | 49 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 55 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 1362 | 5 |
| WA | 9 | 09 (84%) | 77 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 39 | 8 | 4982 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 19 | 54 | 69 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 48 | 8 | 44 | 9 | 2303 | 7 | |
| CA | 40 | 45 (64%) | 61 | 47 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 48 | 8 | 49 | 10 | 4390 | 8 |
| CA | 51 | 53 (51%) | 64 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 6383 | 9 |
| NJ | 6 | 06 (89%) | 63 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 40 | 8 | 5104 | 9 |
| NJ | 12 | 12 (87%) | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 48 | 10 | 2928 | 7 |
| NY | 3 | 03 (64%) | 65 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 42 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 6713 | 9 |
| TX | 22 | 22 (75%) | 49 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 55 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 1362 | 5 |
| WA | 9 | 09 (84%) | 77 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 39 | 8 | 4982 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 12 | 13 (100%) | 72 | 91 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 11703 | 10 |
| MA | 7 | 07 (97%) | 82 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 47 | 9 | 19932 | 10 |
| NJ | 8 | 08 (93%) | 69 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 26364 | 10 |
| NY | 7 | 71 | 84 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 53502 | 10 | |
| NY | 16 | 16 (75%) | 72 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 10107 | 10 |
| TX | 7 | 63 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 48 | 10 | 7491 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 7 | 03 (73%) | 50 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 1633 | 6 |
| CA | 7 | 06 (56%) | 63 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 4527 | 8 |
| CA | 8 | 64 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 4073 | 8 | |
| CA | 9 | 09 (75%) | 57 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 3261 | 8 |
| CA | 27 | 25 (80%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 2692 | 7 |
| FL | 9 | 09 (71%) | 50 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 1843 | 6 |
| IL | 3 | 69 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 57 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 9512 | 10 | |
| NJ | 9 | 09 (83%) | 66 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 10010 | 10 |
| NM | 1 | 01 (74%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 51 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 1672 | 6 |
| NM | 2 | 02 (73%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 364 | 2 |
| NM | 3 | 03 (81%) | 47 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 62 | 9 | 24 | 3 | 119 | 1 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| IL | 8 | 08 (66%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 3634 | 8 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NV | 4 | 04 (83%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 58 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 2417 | 7 |
| NY | 11 | 11 (87%) | 66 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 46 | 7 | 36 | 7 | 19506 | 10 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 11 | 12 (92%) | 70 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 63 | 10 | 26597 | 10 |
| CA | 16 | 18 (69%) | 66 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 61 | 10 | 5440 | 9 |
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| NY | 10 | 71 | 87 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 59 | 10 | 66619 | 10 | |
| NY | 12 | 12 (60%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 79 | 10 | 102616 | 10 |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| VA | 11 | 11 (68%) | 64 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 66 | 10 | 4091 | 8 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 11 | 12 (92%) | 70 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 63 | 10 | 26597 | 10 |
| CA | 16 | 18 (69%) | 66 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 61 | 10 | 5440 | 9 |
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 2 | 02 (78%) | 51 | 68 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 56 | 10 | 945 | 5 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| NY | 10 | 71 | 87 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 59 | 10 | 66619 | 10 | |
| NY | 12 | 12 (60%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 79 | 10 | 102616 | 10 |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| VA | 11 | 11 (68%) | 64 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 66 | 10 | 4091 | 8 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 37 | 37 (69%) | 74 | 89 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 17265 | 10 |
| CA | 43 | 43 (72%) | 74 | 85 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 92 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 13830 | 10 |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| NY | 13 | 13 (89%) | 78 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 33 | 6 | 97549 | 10 |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| NY | 15 | 15 (64%) | 79 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 65351 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 18 | 20 (55%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 4444 | 8 |
| CA | 29 | 29 (87%) | 68 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 12713 | 10 |
| CA | 31 | 32 (92%) | 65 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 7881 | 9 |
| CA | 34 | 34 (86%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 88 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 21415 | 10 |
| CA | 35 | 35 (80%) | 65 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 6262 | 9 |
| CA | 37 | 37 (69%) | 74 | 89 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 17265 | 10 |
| CA | 38 | 38 (63%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 6992 | 9 |
| CA | 39 | 41 (95%) | 62 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 78 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 4414 | 8 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 43 | 43 (72%) | 74 | 85 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 92 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 13830 | 10 |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| CA | 46 | 46 (80%) | 67 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 12167 | 10 |
| IL | 4 | 70 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 74 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 10759 | 10 | |
| NY | 13 | 13 (89%) | 78 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 33 | 6 | 97549 | 10 |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| NY | 15 | 15 (64%) | 79 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 65351 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 37 | 37 (69%) | 74 | 89 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 17265 | 10 |
| CA | 43 | 43 (72%) | 74 | 85 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 92 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 13830 | 10 |
| CA | 44 | 44 (62%) | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 11495 | 10 |
| NY | 13 | 13 (89%) | 78 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 83 | 10 | 33 | 6 | 97549 | 10 |
| NY | 14 | 14 (57%) | 75 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 26 | 4 | 44682 | 10 |
| NY | 15 | 15 (64%) | 79 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 65351 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 12 | 13 (100%) | 72 | 91 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 11703 | 10 |
| FL | 10 | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 34 | 7 | 3966 | 8 | |
| FL | 25 | 23 (78%) | 57 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 66 | 9 | 37 | 8 | 4880 | 9 |
| GA | 7 | 07 (58%) | 66 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2798 | 7 |
| MA | 7 | 07 (97%) | 82 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 47 | 9 | 19932 | 10 |
| NC | 12 | 12 (72%) | 67 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 2038 | 7 |
| NJ | 8 | 08 (93%) | 69 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 26364 | 10 |
| NY | 7 | 71 | 84 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 53502 | 10 | |
| NY | 16 | 16 (75%) | 72 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 10107 | 10 |
| TX | 7 | 63 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 48 | 10 | 7491 | 9 | |
| TX | 32 | 61 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 6418 | 9 | |
| WI | 4 | 04 (88%) | 71 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 31 | 6 | 7033 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| IL | 11 | 59 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 2011 | 7 | |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NE | 2 | 02 (97%) | 58 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 28 | 4 | 40 | 8 | 2541 | 7 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 3 | 03 (76%) | 48 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 1833 | 6 |
| TX | 21 | 21 (76%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 42 | 9 | 783 | 4 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 26 | 26 (74%) | 45 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 40 | 6 | 43 | 9 | 1462 | 6 |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| WA | 1 | 01 (65%) | 68 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 37 | 6 | 48 | 10 | 3514 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| MI | 6 | 12 (57%) | 55 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 28 | 4 | 50 | 10 | 1839 | 6 |
| MI | 11 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 48 | 9 | 2921 | 7 | |
| MN | 3 | 03 (94%) | 61 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 49 | 10 | 2102 | 7 |
| NJ | 3 | 03 (56%) | 51 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 34 | 5 | 42 | 9 | 1558 | 6 |
| NJ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 39 | 6 | 51 | 10 | 2656 | 7 |
| NY | 25 | 25 (94%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2171 | 7 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 1 | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 780 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 5 | 05 (100%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 32 | 6 | 424 | 3 |
| AR | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 31 | 6 | 564 | 3 |
| FL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 42 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 960 | 5 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| NY | 26 | 26 (89%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 3694 | 8 |
| OH | 10 | 10 (90%) | 54 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 26 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1725 | 6 |
| TN | 7 | 07 (55%) | 42 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 450 | 3 |
| VA | 2 | 02 (65%) | 54 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 39 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1363 | 5 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 14 | 14 (67%) | 57 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 36 | 7 | 4041 | 8 |
| NC | 4 | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 42 | 8 | 886 | 4 | |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NY | 4 | 04 (84%) | 68 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 8 | 42 | 9 | 8189 | 9 |
| OH | 3 | 03 (67%) | 69 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 43 | 9 | 4662 | 9 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| VA | 7 | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 46 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 1036 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 5 | 05 (86%) | 74 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 4065 | 8 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| TX | 9 | 09 (65%) | 69 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 4853 | 9 |
| TX | 18 | 18 (77%) | 66 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 26 | 3 | 4434 | 8 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 7 | 06 (56%) | 63 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 4527 | 8 |
| CA | 14 | 15 (86%) | 67 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 5491 | 9 |
| CA | 15 | 14 (82%) | 70 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 47 | 9 | 10116 | 10 |
| CA | 17 | 17 (90%) | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 77 | 10 | 59 | 10 | 7865 | 9 |
| CA | 28 | 27 (87%) | 67 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 45 | 9 | 6661 | 9 |
| CA | 45 | 66 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 72 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 8207 | 10 | |
| HI | 1 | 01 (100%) | 63 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 37 | 7 | 8541 | 10 |
| HI | 2 | 02 (99%) | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 68 | 9 | 30 | 5 | 808 | 4 |
| NY | 6 | 06 (81%) | 72 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 75 | 10 | 37 | 8 | 42610 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 12 | 13 (100%) | 72 | 91 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 11703 | 10 |
| MA | 7 | 07 (97%) | 82 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 47 | 9 | 19932 | 10 |
| NJ | 8 | 08 (93%) | 69 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 26364 | 10 |
| NY | 7 | 71 | 84 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 53502 | 10 | |
| NY | 16 | 16 (75%) | 72 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 10107 | 10 |
| TX | 7 | 63 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 48 | 10 | 7491 | 9 | |
| TX | 32 | 61 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 6418 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 5 | 05 (86%) | 74 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 4065 | 8 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| TX | 9 | 09 (65%) | 69 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 4853 | 9 |
| TX | 18 | 18 (77%) | 66 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 26 | 3 | 4434 | 8 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 5 | 05 (86%) | 74 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 4065 | 8 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| TX | 9 | 09 (65%) | 69 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 4853 | 9 |
| TX | 18 | 18 (77%) | 66 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 26 | 3 | 4434 | 8 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| MD | 5 | 05 (92%) | 64 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 1098 | 5 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| FL | 14 | 14 (67%) | 57 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 36 | 7 | 4041 | 8 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| NC | 4 | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 42 | 8 | 886 | 4 | |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NY | 4 | 04 (84%) | 68 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 8 | 42 | 9 | 8189 | 9 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| OH | 3 | 03 (67%) | 69 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 43 | 9 | 4662 | 9 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| VA | 7 | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 46 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 1036 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 6 | 02 (69%) | 42 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 36 | 7 | 821 | 4 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| CT | 5 | 05 (99%) | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 33 | 5 | 37 | 7 | 1228 | 5 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 3 | 03 (96%) | 62 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 38 | 8 | 1905 | 6 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 6 | 02 (69%) | 42 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 36 | 7 | 821 | 4 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| CT | 5 | 05 (99%) | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 33 | 5 | 37 | 7 | 1228 | 5 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 3 | 03 (96%) | 62 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 38 | 8 | 1905 | 6 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| NY | 20 | 20 (88%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 40 | 8 | 1559 | 6 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| AZ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 49 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 3137 | 8 |
| MT | 1 | 00 (100%) | 43 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 128 | 1 |
| MT | 2 | 00 (100%) | 42 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 83 | 1 |
| NE | 1 | 01 (89%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 1017 | 5 |
| OR | 6 | 05 (58%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 34 | 6 | 1910 | 6 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| TX | 4 | 04 (55%) | 42 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 39 | 8 | 729 | 4 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| UT | 4 | 04 (83%) | 45 | 30 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 2218 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 5 | 05 (100%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 32 | 6 | 424 | 3 |
| FL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 42 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 960 | 5 |
| FL | 21 | 18 (98%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 32 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1723 | 6 |
| MD | 1 | 01 (60%) | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 654 | 4 |
| OH | 10 | 10 (90%) | 54 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 26 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1725 | 6 |
| PA | 12 | 18 (86%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 38 | 8 | 3147 | 8 |
| TN | 7 | 07 (55%) | 42 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 450 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 10 | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 34 | 7 | 3966 | 8 | |
| FL | 25 | 23 (78%) | 57 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 66 | 9 | 37 | 8 | 4880 | 9 |
| GA | 7 | 07 (58%) | 66 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2798 | 7 |
| IN | 7 | 07 (74%) | 64 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 33 | 6 | 3268 | 8 |
| NC | 12 | 12 (72%) | 67 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 2038 | 7 |
| PA | 2 | 02 (96%) | 72 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 25 | 3 | 15355 | 10 |
| WI | 4 | 04 (88%) | 71 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 31 | 6 | 7033 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 5 | 05 (86%) | 74 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 4065 | 8 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 6 | 06 (90%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 593 | 3 |
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 14 | 14 (67%) | 57 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 36 | 7 | 4041 | 8 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| NC | 4 | 57 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 42 | 8 | 886 | 4 | |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| NC | 14 | 12 (50%) | 61 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 46 | 9 | 2184 | 7 |
| NY | 4 | 04 (84%) | 68 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 8 | 42 | 9 | 8189 | 9 |
| OH | 1 | 01 (69%) | 60 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 30 | 4 | 44 | 9 | 2511 | 7 |
| OH | 3 | 03 (67%) | 69 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 43 | 9 | 4662 | 9 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| TN | 5 | 51 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 28 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 1030 | 5 | |
| VA | 7 | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 46 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 1036 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| AZ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 49 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 3137 | 8 |
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| IL | 8 | 08 (66%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 3634 | 8 |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| MT | 1 | 00 (100%) | 43 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 128 | 1 |
| NE | 1 | 01 (89%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 1017 | 5 |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| OR | 6 | 05 (58%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 34 | 6 | 1910 | 6 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| UT | 4 | 04 (83%) | 45 | 30 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 2218 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| AZ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 49 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 3137 | 8 |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| MT | 1 | 00 (100%) | 43 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 128 | 1 |
| MT | 2 | 00 (100%) | 42 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 83 | 1 |
| NE | 1 | 01 (89%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 1017 | 5 |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| OR | 6 | 05 (58%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 34 | 6 | 1910 | 6 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| TX | 4 | 04 (55%) | 42 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 39 | 8 | 729 | 4 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| UT | 4 | 04 (83%) | 45 | 30 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 2218 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| MD | 5 | 05 (92%) | 64 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 1098 | 5 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| FL | 27 | 27 (82%) | 61 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 83 | 10 | 39 | 8 | 9355 | 10 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 16 | 16 (94%) | 56 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 3295 | 8 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| TX | 34 | 34 (75%) | 50 | 62 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 90 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 1373 | 5 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| TX | 9 | 09 (65%) | 69 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 4853 | 9 |
| TX | 18 | 18 (77%) | 66 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 26 | 3 | 4434 | 8 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| FL | 27 | 27 (82%) | 61 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 83 | 10 | 39 | 8 | 9355 | 10 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 16 | 16 (94%) | 56 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 3295 | 8 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| TX | 34 | 34 (75%) | 50 | 62 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 90 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 1373 | 5 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| FL | 27 | 27 (82%) | 61 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 83 | 10 | 39 | 8 | 9355 | 10 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 16 | 16 (94%) | 56 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 3295 | 8 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| TX | 34 | 34 (75%) | 50 | 62 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 90 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 1373 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| IL | 7 | 07 (84%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 44 | 9 | 13838 | 10 |
| MD | 4 | 04 (69%) | 80 | 82 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 36 | 7 | 4185 | 8 |
| MD | 7 | 07 (72%) | 77 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 38 | 8 | 5186 | 9 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| PA | 3 | 03 (94%) | 81 | 92 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 39 | 8 | 20257 | 10 |
| TX | 9 | 09 (65%) | 69 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 4853 | 9 |
| TX | 18 | 18 (77%) | 66 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 26 | 3 | 4434 | 8 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 12 | 13 (100%) | 72 | 91 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 11703 | 10 |
| FL | 10 | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 34 | 7 | 3966 | 8 | |
| FL | 25 | 23 (78%) | 57 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 66 | 9 | 37 | 8 | 4880 | 9 |
| GA | 7 | 07 (58%) | 66 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2798 | 7 |
| IN | 7 | 07 (74%) | 64 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 33 | 6 | 3268 | 8 |
| MA | 7 | 07 (97%) | 82 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 47 | 9 | 19932 | 10 |
| NC | 12 | 12 (72%) | 67 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 2038 | 7 |
| NY | 7 | 71 | 84 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 53502 | 10 | |
| NY | 16 | 16 (75%) | 72 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 10107 | 10 |
| TX | 7 | 63 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 48 | 10 | 7491 | 9 | |
| TX | 32 | 61 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 6418 | 9 | |
| WI | 4 | 04 (88%) | 71 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 31 | 6 | 7033 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 3 | 07 (86%) | 61 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 6474 | 9 |
| CA | 21 | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 2924 | 7 | |
| CA | 22 | 21 (57%) | 53 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2398 | 7 |
| CA | 33 | 31 (75%) | 66 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 5505 | 9 |
| CA | 42 | 68 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 13960 | 10 | |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| FL | 27 | 27 (82%) | 61 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 83 | 10 | 39 | 8 | 9355 | 10 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 16 | 16 (94%) | 56 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 3295 | 8 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 29 | 29 (82%) | 61 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 90 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4778 | 9 |
| TX | 33 | 33 (71%) | 62 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 84 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 4793 | 9 |
| TX | 34 | 34 (75%) | 50 | 62 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 90 | 10 | 17 | 1 | 1373 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 12 | 13 (100%) | 72 | 91 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 65 | 9 | 51 | 10 | 11703 | 10 |
| FL | 10 | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 34 | 7 | 3966 | 8 | |
| FL | 25 | 23 (78%) | 57 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 66 | 9 | 37 | 8 | 4880 | 9 |
| GA | 7 | 07 (58%) | 66 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2798 | 7 |
| MA | 7 | 07 (97%) | 82 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 47 | 9 | 19932 | 10 |
| NJ | 8 | 08 (93%) | 69 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 73 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 26364 | 10 |
| NY | 7 | 71 | 84 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 53502 | 10 | |
| NY | 16 | 16 (75%) | 72 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 10107 | 10 |
| TX | 7 | 63 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 70 | 9 | 48 | 10 | 7491 | 9 | |
| TX | 32 | 61 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 6418 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 20 | 20 (73%) | 69 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 76 | 10 | 24 | 3 | 5039 | 9 |
| FL | 24 | 24 (69%) | 72 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 82 | 10 | 28 | 4 | 9137 | 10 |
| GA | 4 | 04 (71%) | 74 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 72 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2625 | 7 |
| GA | 13 | 13 (85%) | 75 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 1724 | 6 |
| NJ | 10 | 10 (80%) | 78 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 13538 | 10 |
| NY | 5 | 05 (86%) | 79 | 83 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 87 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 26638 | 10 |
| NY | 8 | 08 (75%) | 78 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 43513 | 10 |
| NY | 9 | 09 (71%) | 78 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 69 | 9 | 35 | 7 | 55467 | 10 |
| TX | 9 | 09 (65%) | 69 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 86 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 4853 | 9 |
| TX | 18 | 18 (77%) | 66 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 81 | 10 | 26 | 3 | 4434 | 8 |
| TX | 30 | 30 (84%) | 66 | 78 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 79 | 10 | 27 | 4 | 3529 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 30 | 28 (85%) | 67 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 43 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 11776 | 10 |
| CA | 32 | 30 (77%) | 65 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 6861 | 9 |
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| MD | 3 | 57 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 1918 | 6 | |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 24 | 52 | 40 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 35 | 5 | 51 | 10 | 3857 | 8 | |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| TX | 38 | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 47 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 3467 | 8 | |
| VA | 10 | 10 (73%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 1528 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 11 | 12 (92%) | 70 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 63 | 10 | 26597 | 10 |
| CA | 16 | 18 (69%) | 66 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 61 | 10 | 5440 | 9 |
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NY | 10 | 71 | 87 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 59 | 10 | 66619 | 10 | |
| NY | 12 | 12 (60%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 79 | 10 | 102616 | 10 |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| VA | 11 | 11 (68%) | 64 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 66 | 10 | 4091 | 8 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| MD | 5 | 05 (92%) | 64 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 1098 | 5 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 7 | 07 (83%) | 61 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 424 | 3 |
| GA | 2 | 02 (85%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 57 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 297 | 2 |
| IL | 1 | 01 (66%) | 77 | 73 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 31 | 6 | 4168 | 8 |
| IL | 2 | 02 (77%) | 67 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 1512 | 6 |
| MD | 5 | 05 (92%) | 64 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 62 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 1098 | 5 |
| MI | 12 | 13 (54%) | 69 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 26 | 3 | 4741 | 9 |
| MI | 13 | 70 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 60 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 4965 | 9 | |
| MO | 1 | 01 (90%) | 71 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 4239 | 8 |
| MS | 2 | 02 (90%) | 53 | 64 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 66 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NC | 1 | 01 (54%) | 54 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 50 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 235 | 1 |
| OH | 11 | 11 (71%) | 73 | 80 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 5014 | 9 |
| SC | 6 | 06 (77%) | 57 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TN | 9 | 09 (88%) | 76 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 71 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 2145 | 7 |
| VA | 3 | 03 (81%) | 69 | 68 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 27 | 4 | 3790 | 8 |
| VA | 4 | 04 (78%) | 62 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1295 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 11 | 12 (92%) | 70 | 88 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 63 | 10 | 26597 | 10 |
| CA | 16 | 18 (69%) | 66 | 76 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 54 | 8 | 61 | 10 | 5440 | 9 |
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| NY | 10 | 71 | 87 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 59 | 10 | 66619 | 10 | |
| NY | 12 | 12 (60%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 79 | 10 | 102616 | 10 |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| VA | 11 | 11 (68%) | 64 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 66 | 10 | 4091 | 8 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| IL | 11 | 59 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 2011 | 7 | |
| MI | 6 | 12 (57%) | 55 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 28 | 4 | 50 | 10 | 1839 | 6 |
| MN | 3 | 03 (94%) | 61 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 49 | 10 | 2102 | 7 |
| MN | 4 | 04 (100%) | 65 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 3319 | 8 |
| MN | 5 | 05 (100%) | 69 | 81 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 48 | 9 | 6545 | 9 |
| NJ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 39 | 6 | 51 | 10 | 2656 | 7 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 21 | 21 (76%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 42 | 9 | 783 | 4 |
| WA | 1 | 01 (65%) | 68 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 37 | 6 | 48 | 10 | 3514 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 2 | 01 (66%) | 32 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 23 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| MI | 3 | 02 (50%) | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 1930 | 6 |
| MT | 1 | 00 (100%) | 43 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 128 | 1 |
| MT | 2 | 00 (100%) | 42 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 83 | 1 |
| OK | 1 | 01 (96%) | 44 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1685 | 6 |
| OK | 5 | 05 (79%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 1069 | 5 |
| WA | 10 | 10 (93%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 29 | 5 | 2330 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| CA | 5 | 44 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 921 | 4 | |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 36 | 33 (65%) | 68 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 64 | 10 | 10377 | 10 |
| CA | 50 | 52 (54%) | 64 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 5672 | 9 |
| CO | 1 | 01 (100%) | 66 | 79 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 41 | 7 | 50 | 10 | 7527 | 9 |
| CO | 2 | 02 (78%) | 51 | 68 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 56 | 10 | 945 | 5 |
| CT | 4 | 04 (100%) | 63 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 52 | 10 | 3006 | 7 |
| GA | 6 | 06 (54%) | 52 | 38 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 33 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1609 | 6 |
| IL | 5 | 05 (57%) | 69 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 10588 | 10 |
| IL | 9 | 09 (69%) | 70 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 53 | 10 | 8332 | 10 |
| MA | 5 | 05 (95%) | 75 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 59 | 10 | 5370 | 9 |
| MD | 8 | 08 (75%) | 60 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 54 | 10 | 2318 | 7 |
| NC | 2 | 04 (72%) | 65 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 6 | 58 | 10 | 2277 | 7 |
| NJ | 11 | 11 (77%) | 55 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 56 | 10 | 3018 | 7 |
| NY | 10 | 71 | 87 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 59 | 10 | 66619 | 10 | |
| NY | 12 | 12 (60%) | 70 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 79 | 10 | 102616 | 10 |
| TX | 37 | 53 | 76 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 58 | 10 | 4457 | 8 | |
| VA | 8 | 08 (91%) | 70 | 77 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 48 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 8520 | 10 |
| VA | 11 | 11 (68%) | 64 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 66 | 10 | 4091 | 8 |
| WA | 7 | 07 (96%) | 80 | 86 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 63 | 10 | 9374 | 10 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 10 | 11 (61%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 53 | 10 | 3109 | 8 |
| CA | 19 | 54 | 69 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 48 | 8 | 44 | 9 | 2303 | 7 | |
| CA | 40 | 45 (64%) | 61 | 47 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 48 | 8 | 49 | 10 | 4390 | 8 |
| CA | 47 | 48 (63%) | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 47 | 7 | 56 | 10 | 6215 | 9 |
| CA | 51 | 53 (51%) | 64 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 51 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 6383 | 9 |
| NJ | 6 | 06 (89%) | 63 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 55 | 8 | 40 | 8 | 5104 | 9 |
| NJ | 12 | 12 (87%) | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 48 | 10 | 2928 | 7 |
| NY | 3 | 03 (64%) | 65 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 42 | 7 | 49 | 10 | 6713 | 9 |
| TX | 22 | 22 (75%) | 49 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 55 | 8 | 43 | 9 | 1362 | 5 |
| WA | 9 | 09 (84%) | 77 | 71 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 39 | 8 | 4982 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 10 | 60 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 61 | 9 | 34 | 7 | 3966 | 8 | |
| FL | 25 | 23 (78%) | 57 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 66 | 9 | 37 | 8 | 4880 | 9 |
| GA | 7 | 07 (58%) | 66 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 40 | 8 | 2798 | 7 |
| IN | 7 | 07 (74%) | 64 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 50 | 8 | 33 | 6 | 3268 | 8 |
| NC | 12 | 12 (72%) | 67 | 64 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 56 | 8 | 37 | 7 | 2038 | 7 |
| NY | 16 | 16 (75%) | 72 | 72 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 58 | 8 | 45 | 9 | 10107 | 10 |
| PA | 2 | 02 (96%) | 72 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 25 | 3 | 15355 | 10 |
| TX | 32 | 61 | 65 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 64 | 9 | 37 | 7 | 6418 | 9 | |
| WI | 4 | 04 (88%) | 71 | 75 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 31 | 6 | 7033 | 9 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 3 | 03 (96%) | 39 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 195 | 1 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| FL | 18 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 525 | 3 | |
| GA | 1 | 01 (97%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 369 | 2 |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| MS | 1 | 01 (100%) | 33 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 186 | 1 |
| MS | 4 | 04 (100%) | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 301 | 2 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| SC | 7 | 07 (99%) | 40 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 312 | 2 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 2 | 02 (93%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 210 | 1 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 4 | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 45 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1203 | 5 | |
| GA | 1 | 01 (97%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 369 | 2 |
| GA | 8 | 08 (81%) | 37 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 39 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 196 | 1 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| GA | 12 | 12 (85%) | 44 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 45 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 263 | 2 |
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| MS | 3 | 03 (91%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 26 | 3 | 160 | 1 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 3 | 03 (96%) | 39 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 195 | 1 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| FL | 18 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 525 | 3 | |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| MS | 1 | 01 (100%) | 33 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 186 | 1 |
| MS | 4 | 04 (100%) | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 301 | 2 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| SC | 7 | 07 (99%) | 40 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 312 | 2 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 4 | 04 (94%) | 29 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 18 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 140 | 1 |
| FL | 12 | 12 (55%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 994 | 5 |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| KY | 2 | 02 (87%) | 36 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 269 | 2 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 5 | 05 (100%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 32 | 6 | 424 | 3 |
| AR | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 31 | 6 | 564 | 3 |
| FL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 42 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 960 | 5 |
| FL | 21 | 18 (98%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 32 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1723 | 6 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| MD | 1 | 01 (60%) | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 654 | 4 |
| NJ | 2 | 02 (90%) | 42 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 891 | 4 |
| NY | 26 | 26 (89%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 3694 | 8 |
| OH | 10 | 10 (90%) | 54 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 26 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1725 | 6 |
| PA | 12 | 18 (86%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 38 | 8 | 3147 | 8 |
| TN | 7 | 07 (55%) | 42 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 450 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 6 | 06 (90%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 593 | 3 |
| CT | 1 | 01 (97%) | 59 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 39 | 6 | 37 | 7 | 2028 | 7 |
| CT | 3 | 03 (96%) | 58 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 35 | 5 | 37 | 8 | 2507 | 7 |
| FL | 5 | 04 (86%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 33 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 1871 | 6 |
| FL | 22 | 21 (92%) | 55 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 4256 | 8 |
| FL | 23 | 22 (89%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 42 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4864 | 9 |
| GA | 11 | 11 (88%) | 48 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 1468 | 6 |
| NC | 13 | 02 (59%) | 54 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 38 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 737 | 4 |
| PA | 5 | 05 (90%) | 68 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 40 | 8 | 5232 | 9 |
| SC | 1 | 01 (91%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 29 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 894 | 4 |
| VA | 7 | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 46 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 1036 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 1 | 01 (91%) | 35 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 101 | 1 |
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| GA | 14 | 14 (90%) | 35 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 454 | 3 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| SC | 3 | 03 (95%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 26 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 245 | 2 |
| TN | 6 | 06 (72%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 344 | 2 |
| TN | 8 | 08 (82%) | 36 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 201 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| CA | 1 | 01 (73%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 332 | 2 |
| CA | 5 | 44 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 921 | 4 | |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| OK | 3 | 03 (74%) | 27 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 183 | 1 |
| OK | 4 | 04 (97%) | 34 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| TX | 13 | 13 (83%) | 35 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 389 | 2 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 1 | 01 (91%) | 35 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 101 | 1 |
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| GA | 14 | 14 (90%) | 35 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 454 | 3 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 8 | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 365 | 2 | |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| SC | 3 | 03 (95%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 26 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 245 | 2 |
| TN | 4 | 04 (83%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 280 | 2 |
| TN | 6 | 06 (72%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 344 | 2 |
| TN | 8 | 08 (82%) | 36 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 201 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 2 | 01 (66%) | 32 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 23 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| CA | 5 | 44 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 921 | 4 | |
| MI | 3 | 02 (50%) | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 1930 | 6 |
| OK | 1 | 01 (96%) | 44 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1685 | 6 |
| OK | 5 | 05 (79%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 1069 | 5 |
| TX | 13 | 13 (83%) | 35 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 389 | 2 |
| WA | 10 | 10 (93%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 29 | 5 | 2330 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 9 | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 20 | 1 | 715 | 4 | |
| CA | 1 | 01 (73%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 332 | 2 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| OK | 3 | 03 (74%) | 27 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 183 | 1 |
| OK | 4 | 04 (97%) | 34 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 9 | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 20 | 1 | 715 | 4 | |
| CA | 1 | 01 (73%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 332 | 2 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| OK | 3 | 03 (74%) | 27 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 183 | 1 |
| OK | 4 | 04 (97%) | 34 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| IN | 5 | 05 (75%) | 48 | 41 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 17 | 2 | 38 | 8 | 962 | 5 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 2 | 01 (66%) | 32 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 23 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| CA | 5 | 44 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 921 | 4 | |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| OK | 3 | 03 (74%) | 27 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 183 | 1 |
| OK | 4 | 04 (97%) | 34 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TX | 13 | 13 (83%) | 35 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 389 | 2 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| CA | 5 | 44 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 921 | 4 | |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| OK | 4 | 04 (97%) | 34 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TX | 13 | 13 (83%) | 35 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 389 | 2 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 6 | 02 (69%) | 42 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 36 | 7 | 821 | 4 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| CT | 5 | 05 (99%) | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 33 | 5 | 37 | 7 | 1228 | 5 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 3 | 03 (96%) | 62 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 38 | 8 | 1905 | 6 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| NY | 20 | 20 (88%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 40 | 8 | 1559 | 6 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| PA | 6 | 06 (98%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 46 | 9 | 1501 | 6 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 5 | 05 (100%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 32 | 6 | 424 | 3 |
| AR | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 31 | 6 | 564 | 3 |
| FL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 42 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 960 | 5 |
| FL | 21 | 18 (98%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 32 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1723 | 6 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| MD | 1 | 01 (60%) | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 654 | 4 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| NJ | 2 | 02 (90%) | 42 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 891 | 4 |
| NY | 26 | 26 (89%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 3694 | 8 |
| OH | 10 | 10 (90%) | 54 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 26 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1725 | 6 |
| PA | 12 | 18 (86%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 38 | 8 | 3147 | 8 |
| TN | 7 | 07 (55%) | 42 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 450 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 7 | 07 (62%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1877 | 6 |
| FL | 11 | 42 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 985 | 5 | |
| FL | 16 | 16 (80%) | 47 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 1969 | 7 |
| MI | 3 | 02 (50%) | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 1930 | 6 |
| NJ | 1 | 01 (95%) | 54 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 3026 | 7 |
| NJ | 2 | 02 (90%) | 42 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 891 | 4 |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| NY | 18 | 18 (70%) | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 34 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 836 | 4 |
| OK | 5 | 05 (79%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 1069 | 5 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 4 | 04 (94%) | 29 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 18 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 140 | 1 |
| FL | 12 | 12 (55%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 994 | 5 |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| KY | 2 | 02 (87%) | 36 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 269 | 2 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| TN | 4 | 04 (83%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 280 | 2 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 13 | 13 (70%) | 50 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 3817 | 8 |
| FL | 17 | 17 (61%) | 41 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 30 | 5 | 1426 | 5 |
| ID | 2 | 02 (96%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 381 | 2 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| KS | 2 | 02 (73%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 26 | 4 | 295 | 2 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| MO | 3 | 03 (58%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 518 | 3 |
| NY | 19 | 43 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 18 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 286 | 2 | |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| TN | 2 | 02 (95%) | 41 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 700 | 4 |
| WI | 1 | 01 (85%) | 52 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 1174 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 3 | 03 (96%) | 39 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 195 | 1 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| FL | 18 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 525 | 3 | |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| MS | 4 | 04 (100%) | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 301 | 2 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 2 | 02 (93%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 210 | 1 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 4 | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 45 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1203 | 5 | |
| GA | 1 | 01 (97%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 369 | 2 |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| GA | 8 | 08 (81%) | 37 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 39 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 196 | 1 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 | |
| SC | 2 | 02 (96%) | 49 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 33 | 6 | 642 | 3 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| SC | 7 | 07 (99%) | 40 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 312 | 2 |
| VA | 2 | 02 (65%) | 54 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 39 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1363 | 5 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 3 | 03 (96%) | 39 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 195 | 1 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| FL | 18 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 525 | 3 | |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| MS | 4 | 04 (100%) | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 301 | 2 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| SC | 7 | 07 (99%) | 40 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 312 | 2 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 1 | 01 (91%) | 35 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 101 | 1 |
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| GA | 14 | 14 (90%) | 35 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 454 | 3 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 8 | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 365 | 2 | |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| SC | 3 | 03 (95%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 26 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 245 | 2 |
| TN | 4 | 04 (83%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 280 | 2 |
| TN | 6 | 06 (72%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 344 | 2 |
| TN | 8 | 08 (82%) | 36 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 201 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 8 | 08 (100%) | 43 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1580 | 6 |
| GA | 9 | 09 (68%) | 32 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 413 | 3 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 2 | 02 (73%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 26 | 4 | 295 | 2 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OH | 8 | 08 (64%) | 50 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 29 | 5 | 1280 | 5 |
| OH | 13 | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1890 | 6 | |
| OH | 15 | 52 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1442 | 5 | |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 2 | 02 (93%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 210 | 1 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 4 | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 45 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1203 | 5 | |
| GA | 1 | 01 (97%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 369 | 2 |
| GA | 8 | 08 (81%) | 37 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 39 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 196 | 1 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| GA | 12 | 12 (85%) | 44 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 45 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 263 | 2 |
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| MS | 3 | 03 (91%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 26 | 3 | 160 | 1 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 | |
| SC | 7 | 07 (99%) | 40 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 312 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 2 | 02 (93%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 210 | 1 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 4 | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 45 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1203 | 5 | |
| GA | 1 | 01 (97%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 369 | 2 |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| GA | 8 | 08 (81%) | 37 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 39 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 196 | 1 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| MO | 5 | 05 (84%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 2574 | 7 |
| MS | 3 | 03 (91%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 26 | 3 | 160 | 1 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 | |
| SC | 2 | 02 (96%) | 49 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 36 | 6 | 33 | 6 | 642 | 3 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| VA | 2 | 02 (65%) | 54 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 39 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1363 | 5 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 2 | 02 (93%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 210 | 1 |
| FL | 4 | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 45 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1203 | 5 | |
| GA | 1 | 01 (97%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 369 | 2 |
| GA | 8 | 08 (81%) | 37 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 39 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 196 | 1 |
| GA | 12 | 12 (85%) | 44 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 45 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 263 | 2 |
| MS | 3 | 03 (91%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 26 | 3 | 160 | 1 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 1 | 01 (91%) | 35 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 101 | 1 |
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| GA | 14 | 14 (90%) | 35 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 454 | 3 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 8 | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 365 | 2 | |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| TN | 4 | 04 (83%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 280 | 2 |
| TN | 6 | 06 (72%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 344 | 2 |
| TN | 8 | 08 (82%) | 36 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 201 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 3 | 03 (96%) | 39 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 195 | 1 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| FL | 18 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 525 | 3 | |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| MS | 1 | 01 (100%) | 33 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 186 | 1 |
| MS | 4 | 04 (100%) | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 301 | 2 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| SC | 7 | 07 (99%) | 40 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 312 | 2 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 2 | 02 (93%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 210 | 1 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 4 | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 45 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1203 | 5 | |
| GA | 1 | 01 (97%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 369 | 2 |
| GA | 8 | 08 (81%) | 37 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 39 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 196 | 1 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| GA | 12 | 12 (85%) | 44 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 45 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 263 | 2 |
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| MS | 3 | 03 (91%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 26 | 3 | 160 | 1 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 8 | 08 (100%) | 43 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1580 | 6 |
| GA | 9 | 09 (68%) | 32 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 413 | 3 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OH | 8 | 08 (64%) | 50 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 29 | 5 | 1280 | 5 |
| OH | 13 | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1890 | 6 | |
| OH | 15 | 52 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1442 | 5 | |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| ID | 1 | 01 (100%) | 36 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 307 | 2 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 13 | 13 (70%) | 50 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 3817 | 8 |
| FL | 17 | 17 (61%) | 41 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 30 | 5 | 1426 | 5 |
| ID | 2 | 02 (96%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 381 | 2 |
| MN | 1 | 01 (90%) | 37 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 214 | 1 |
| PA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 41 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 22 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 715 | 4 |
| PA | 11 | 11 (97%) | 40 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 888 | 4 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WA | 5 | 05 (97%) | 41 | 44 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 475 | 3 |
| WI | 6 | 06 (97%) | 46 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| KY | 5 | 05 (93%) | 30 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 6 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| VA | 9 | 09 (81%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 149 | 1 |
| WV | 1 | 03 (64%) | 30 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 151 | 1 |
| WV | 2 | 01 (67%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 22 | 2 | 239 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| ID | 1 | 01 (100%) | 36 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 307 | 2 |
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| KY | 5 | 05 (93%) | 30 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 6 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| VA | 9 | 09 (81%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 149 | 1 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| WV | 1 | 03 (64%) | 30 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 151 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| NC | 11 | 11 (79%) | 36 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 226 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| PA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 41 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 22 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 715 | 4 |
| PA | 11 | 11 (97%) | 40 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 888 | 4 |
| TN | 4 | 04 (83%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 280 | 2 |
| TN | 6 | 06 (72%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 344 | 2 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WI | 6 | 06 (97%) | 46 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 4 | 04 (94%) | 29 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 18 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 140 | 1 |
| FL | 12 | 12 (55%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 994 | 5 |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| KY | 2 | 02 (87%) | 36 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 269 | 2 |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 13 | 13 (70%) | 50 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 3817 | 8 |
| FL | 17 | 17 (61%) | 41 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 30 | 5 | 1426 | 5 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| KS | 2 | 02 (73%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 26 | 4 | 295 | 2 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MO | 3 | 03 (58%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 518 | 3 |
| NY | 19 | 43 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 18 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 286 | 2 | |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| OH | 13 | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1890 | 6 | |
| TN | 2 | 02 (95%) | 41 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 700 | 4 |
| WI | 1 | 01 (85%) | 52 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 1174 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| MN | 1 | 01 (90%) | 37 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 214 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| PA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 41 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 22 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 715 | 4 |
| PA | 11 | 11 (97%) | 40 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 888 | 4 |
| TN | 4 | 04 (83%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 280 | 2 |
| TN | 6 | 06 (72%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 344 | 2 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WI | 6 | 06 (97%) | 46 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| KY | 5 | 05 (93%) | 30 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 6 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| MO | 8 | 08 (84%) | 31 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| OH | 6 | 06 (55%) | 39 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 456 | 3 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| VA | 9 | 09 (81%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 149 | 1 |
| WV | 1 | 03 (64%) | 30 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 151 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| ID | 1 | 01 (100%) | 36 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 307 | 2 |
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| FL | 8 | 08 (100%) | 43 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1580 | 6 |
| KS | 1 | 01 (83%) | 36 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 122 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| KY | 6 | 06 (93%) | 45 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 831 | 4 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OH | 13 | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1890 | 6 | |
| OR | 4 | 04 (91%) | 46 | 56 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 19 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 591 | 3 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| PA | 7 | 07 (90%) | 50 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1692 | 6 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 8 | 08 (100%) | 43 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1580 | 6 |
| FL | 13 | 13 (70%) | 50 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 3817 | 8 |
| FL | 17 | 17 (61%) | 41 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 30 | 5 | 1426 | 5 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| KS | 2 | 02 (73%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 26 | 4 | 295 | 2 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| MO | 3 | 03 (58%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 518 | 3 |
| NY | 19 | 43 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 18 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 286 | 2 | |
| NY | 22 | 24 (60%) | 51 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1079 | 5 |
| OH | 13 | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 1890 | 6 | |
| TN | 2 | 02 (95%) | 41 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 700 | 4 |
| WI | 1 | 01 (85%) | 52 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 1174 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| KY | 5 | 05 (93%) | 30 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 6 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| OH | 6 | 06 (55%) | 39 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 456 | 3 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| VA | 9 | 09 (81%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 149 | 1 |
| WV | 1 | 03 (64%) | 30 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 151 | 1 |
| WV | 2 | 01 (67%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 22 | 2 | 239 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 4 | 04 (94%) | 29 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 18 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 140 | 1 |
| FL | 12 | 12 (55%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 994 | 5 |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| KY | 2 | 02 (87%) | 36 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 269 | 2 |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| ID | 1 | 01 (100%) | 36 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 307 | 2 |
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| KY | 5 | 05 (93%) | 30 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 6 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| VA | 9 | 09 (81%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 149 | 1 |
| WV | 1 | 03 (64%) | 30 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 151 | 1 |
| WV | 2 | 01 (67%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 22 | 2 | 239 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| ID | 1 | 01 (100%) | 36 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 307 | 2 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI | 2 | 37 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 147 | 1 | |
| MO | 8 | 08 (84%) | 31 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| OH | 6 | 06 (55%) | 39 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 456 | 3 |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | 1 | 01 (100%) | 36 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 307 | 2 |
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| KY | 5 | 05 (93%) | 30 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 6 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| VA | 9 | 09 (81%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 149 | 1 |
| WV | 1 | 03 (64%) | 30 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 151 | 1 |
| WV | 2 | 01 (67%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 22 | 2 | 239 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| NC | 11 | 11 (79%) | 36 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 226 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| ID | 1 | 01 (100%) | 36 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 307 | 2 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| NC | 11 | 11 (79%) | 36 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 226 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 37 | 7 | 556 | 3 |
| FL | 13 | 13 (70%) | 50 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 3817 | 8 |
| FL | 17 | 17 (61%) | 41 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 30 | 5 | 1426 | 5 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| KS | 2 | 02 (73%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 26 | 4 | 295 | 2 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MO | 3 | 03 (58%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 518 | 3 |
| NY | 19 | 43 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 18 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 286 | 2 | |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| TN | 2 | 02 (95%) | 41 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 700 | 4 |
| WI | 1 | 01 (85%) | 52 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 1174 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 4 | 04 (94%) | 29 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 18 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 140 | 1 |
| FL | 12 | 12 (55%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 994 | 5 |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| KY | 2 | 02 (87%) | 36 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 269 | 2 |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 4 | 04 (94%) | 29 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 18 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 140 | 1 |
| FL | 12 | 12 (55%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 994 | 5 |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| KY | 2 | 02 (87%) | 36 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 269 | 2 |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MN | 1 | 01 (90%) | 37 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 214 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| PA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 41 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 22 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 715 | 4 |
| PA | 11 | 11 (97%) | 40 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 888 | 4 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WA | 5 | 05 (97%) | 41 | 44 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 475 | 3 |
| WI | 6 | 06 (97%) | 46 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| MI | 2 | 37 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 147 | 1 | |
| MO | 8 | 08 (84%) | 31 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| OH | 6 | 06 (55%) | 39 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 456 | 3 |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 3 | 03 (96%) | 39 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 195 | 1 |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| MS | 1 | 01 (100%) | 33 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 186 | 1 |
| MS | 4 | 04 (100%) | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 301 | 2 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| SC | 7 | 07 (99%) | 40 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 312 | 2 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 2 | 02 (93%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 210 | 1 |
| FL | 4 | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 45 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1203 | 5 | |
| GA | 1 | 01 (97%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 369 | 2 |
| GA | 8 | 08 (81%) | 37 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 39 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 196 | 1 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| GA | 12 | 12 (85%) | 44 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 45 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 263 | 2 |
| MD | 2 | 02 (55%) | 65 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 44 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 4644 | 8 |
| MS | 3 | 03 (91%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 26 | 3 | 160 | 1 |
| NC | 6 | 57 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 939 | 4 | |
| NC | 9 | 51 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 473 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 3 | 03 (96%) | 39 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 195 | 1 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| FL | 18 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 525 | 3 | |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| MS | 1 | 01 (100%) | 33 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 186 | 1 |
| MS | 4 | 04 (100%) | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 301 | 2 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| SC | 7 | 07 (99%) | 40 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 312 | 2 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 49 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 3137 | 8 |
| MT | 1 | 00 (100%) | 43 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 128 | 1 |
| MT | 2 | 00 (100%) | 42 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 83 | 1 |
| NE | 1 | 01 (89%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 1017 | 5 |
| OK | 1 | 01 (96%) | 44 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1685 | 6 |
| OK | 5 | 05 (79%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 1069 | 5 |
| OR | 6 | 05 (58%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 34 | 6 | 1910 | 6 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| TX | 4 | 04 (55%) | 42 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 39 | 8 | 729 | 4 |
| UT | 4 | 04 (83%) | 45 | 30 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 2218 | 7 |
| WA | 10 | 10 (93%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 29 | 5 | 2330 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 1 | 01 (91%) | 35 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 101 | 1 |
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| GA | 14 | 14 (90%) | 35 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 454 | 3 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 8 | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 365 | 2 | |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| SC | 3 | 03 (95%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 26 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 245 | 2 |
| TN | 4 | 04 (83%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 280 | 2 |
| TN | 6 | 06 (72%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 344 | 2 |
| TN | 8 | 08 (82%) | 36 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 201 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| NC | 11 | 11 (79%) | 36 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 226 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 3 | 03 (96%) | 39 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 195 | 1 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| FL | 18 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 525 | 3 | |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| MS | 1 | 01 (100%) | 33 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 186 | 1 |
| MS | 4 | 04 (100%) | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 301 | 2 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| SC | 7 | 07 (99%) | 40 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 312 | 2 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 1 | 01 (91%) | 35 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 101 | 1 |
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| GA | 14 | 14 (90%) | 35 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 454 | 3 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 8 | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 365 | 2 | |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| TN | 4 | 04 (83%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 280 | 2 |
| TN | 6 | 06 (72%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 344 | 2 |
| TN | 8 | 08 (82%) | 36 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 201 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| GA | 14 | 14 (90%) | 35 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 454 | 3 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 8 | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 365 | 2 | |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| OH | 8 | 08 (64%) | 50 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 29 | 5 | 1280 | 5 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| SC | 3 | 03 (95%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 26 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 245 | 2 |
| TN | 8 | 08 (82%) | 36 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 201 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MI | 2 | 37 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 147 | 1 | |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| AZ | 9 | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 20 | 1 | 715 | 4 | |
| CA | 1 | 01 (73%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 332 | 2 |
| CA | 5 | 44 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 921 | 4 | |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| OK | 3 | 03 (74%) | 27 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 183 | 1 |
| OK | 4 | 04 (97%) | 34 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| TX | 13 | 13 (83%) | 35 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 389 | 2 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| NC | 11 | 11 (79%) | 36 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 226 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 4 | 04 (94%) | 29 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 18 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 140 | 1 |
| FL | 12 | 12 (55%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 994 | 5 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| KY | 2 | 02 (87%) | 36 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 269 | 2 |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| KY | 2 | 02 (87%) | 36 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 269 | 2 |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 2 | 37 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 147 | 1 | |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| MO | 8 | 08 (84%) | 31 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| OH | 6 | 06 (55%) | 39 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 456 | 3 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 4 | 04 (94%) | 29 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 18 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 140 | 1 |
| FL | 12 | 12 (55%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 994 | 5 |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| KY | 2 | 02 (87%) | 36 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 269 | 2 |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| PA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 41 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 22 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 715 | 4 |
| PA | 11 | 11 (97%) | 40 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 888 | 4 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WI | 6 | 06 (97%) | 46 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 4 | 04 (94%) | 29 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 18 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 140 | 1 |
| FL | 12 | 12 (55%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 994 | 5 |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| KY | 2 | 02 (87%) | 36 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 269 | 2 |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| MI | 2 | 37 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 147 | 1 | |
| MO | 8 | 08 (84%) | 31 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| OH | 6 | 06 (55%) | 39 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 456 | 3 |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 2 | 01 (66%) | 32 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 23 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| FL | 7 | 07 (62%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1877 | 6 |
| FL | 16 | 16 (80%) | 47 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 1969 | 7 |
| MI | 3 | 02 (50%) | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 1930 | 6 |
| MT | 2 | 00 (100%) | 42 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 83 | 1 |
| OK | 1 | 01 (96%) | 44 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1685 | 6 |
| OK | 5 | 05 (79%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 1069 | 5 |
| WA | 10 | 10 (93%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 29 | 5 | 2330 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI | 2 | 37 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 147 | 1 | |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| MO | 8 | 08 (84%) | 31 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 6 | 06 (55%) | 39 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 456 | 3 |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 9 | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 20 | 1 | 715 | 4 | |
| CA | 1 | 01 (73%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 332 | 2 |
| CA | 5 | 44 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 921 | 4 | |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| OK | 3 | 03 (74%) | 27 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 183 | 1 |
| OK | 4 | 04 (97%) | 34 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| PA | 10 | 10 (96%) | 47 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 25 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 1354 | 5 |
| TX | 13 | 13 (83%) | 35 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 389 | 2 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| AZ | 9 | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 20 | 1 | 715 | 4 | |
| CA | 1 | 01 (73%) | 36 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 332 | 2 |
| CA | 5 | 44 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 921 | 4 | |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| OK | 3 | 03 (74%) | 27 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 183 | 1 |
| OK | 4 | 04 (97%) | 34 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TX | 13 | 13 (83%) | 35 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 389 | 2 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 2 | 01 (66%) | 32 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 23 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| FL | 7 | 07 (62%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1877 | 6 |
| FL | 11 | 42 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 985 | 5 | |
| FL | 16 | 16 (80%) | 47 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 1969 | 7 |
| MI | 3 | 02 (50%) | 53 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 26 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 1930 | 6 |
| MT | 2 | 00 (100%) | 42 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 83 | 1 |
| NJ | 2 | 02 (90%) | 42 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 891 | 4 |
| NY | 18 | 18 (70%) | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 34 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 836 | 4 |
| OK | 1 | 01 (96%) | 44 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1685 | 6 |
| OK | 5 | 05 (79%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 1069 | 5 |
| WA | 10 | 10 (93%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 29 | 5 | 2330 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| MI | 2 | 37 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 147 | 1 | |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| MO | 8 | 08 (84%) | 31 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | 2 | 02 (96%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 381 | 2 |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| MN | 1 | 01 (90%) | 37 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 214 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| OH | 4 | 37 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 400 | 3 | |
| PA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 41 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 22 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 715 | 4 |
| PA | 11 | 11 (97%) | 40 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 888 | 4 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WA | 5 | 05 (97%) | 41 | 44 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 475 | 3 |
| WI | 6 | 06 (97%) | 46 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| KY | 5 | 05 (93%) | 30 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 6 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| MO | 8 | 08 (84%) | 31 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| OH | 6 | 06 (55%) | 39 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 456 | 3 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| VA | 9 | 09 (81%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 149 | 1 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| ID | 1 | 01 (100%) | 36 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 307 | 2 |
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| ID | 1 | 01 (100%) | 36 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 307 | 2 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 2 | 37 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 147 | 1 | |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| MO | 8 | 08 (84%) | 31 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| OH | 6 | 06 (55%) | 39 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 456 | 3 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 1 | 02 (87%) | 49 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 324 | 2 |
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| ID | 1 | 01 (100%) | 36 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 307 | 2 |
| IL | 16 | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 28 | 5 | 256 | 2 | |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 9 | 10 (71%) | 42 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 475 | 3 |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| NC | 11 | 11 (79%) | 36 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 226 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 23 | 23 (58%) | 44 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 383 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| KY | 5 | 05 (93%) | 30 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 6 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 2 | 37 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 147 | 1 | |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| MO | 8 | 08 (84%) | 31 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| OH | 6 | 06 (55%) | 39 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 456 | 3 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 1 | 01 (91%) | 35 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 101 | 1 |
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| NC | 8 | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 365 | 2 | |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| SC | 3 | 03 (95%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 26 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 245 | 2 |
| TN | 8 | 08 (82%) | 36 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 201 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 3 | 03 (96%) | 39 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 195 | 1 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| FL | 18 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 525 | 3 | |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| MS | 1 | 01 (100%) | 33 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 186 | 1 |
| MS | 4 | 04 (100%) | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 301 | 2 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| SC | 7 | 07 (99%) | 40 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 312 | 2 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 3 | 03 (96%) | 39 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 195 | 1 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| GA | 1 | 01 (97%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 369 | 2 |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| MS | 1 | 01 (100%) | 33 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 186 | 1 |
| MS | 4 | 04 (100%) | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 301 | 2 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| SC | 7 | 07 (99%) | 40 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 312 | 2 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| KY | 5 | 05 (93%) | 30 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 6 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| OH | 6 | 06 (55%) | 39 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 456 | 3 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| VA | 9 | 09 (81%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 149 | 1 |
| WV | 1 | 03 (64%) | 30 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 151 | 1 |
| WV | 2 | 01 (67%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 22 | 2 | 239 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 13 | 13 (70%) | 50 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 3817 | 8 |
| FL | 17 | 17 (61%) | 41 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 30 | 5 | 1426 | 5 |
| IA | 3 | 03 (86%) | 56 | 49 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 18 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 638 | 3 |
| IN | 4 | 04 (89%) | 42 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 428 | 3 |
| KS | 2 | 02 (73%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 26 | 4 | 295 | 2 |
| MA | 1 | 01 (91%) | 54 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 908 | 4 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| MO | 3 | 03 (58%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 518 | 3 |
| NY | 19 | 43 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 18 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 286 | 2 | |
| OH | 7 | 16 (65%) | 47 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 36 | 7 | 1336 | 5 |
| TN | 2 | 02 (95%) | 41 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 31 | 6 | 700 | 4 |
| WI | 1 | 01 (85%) | 52 | 49 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 28 | 4 | 1174 | 5 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 4 | 04 (94%) | 29 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 18 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 140 | 1 |
| FL | 12 | 12 (55%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 994 | 5 |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| KY | 2 | 02 (87%) | 36 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 269 | 2 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| FL | 12 | 12 (55%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 994 | 5 |
| GA | 14 | 14 (90%) | 35 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 454 | 3 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| TN | 4 | 04 (83%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 280 | 2 |
| TN | 6 | 06 (72%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 344 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 1 | 01 (91%) | 35 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 101 | 1 |
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| GA | 14 | 14 (90%) | 35 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 454 | 3 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| IN | 2 | 02 (93%) | 42 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 540 | 3 |
| IN | 6 | 06 (50%) | 43 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 719 | 4 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| TN | 4 | 04 (83%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 280 | 2 |
| TN | 6 | 06 (72%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 344 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 5 | 05 (100%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 32 | 6 | 424 | 3 |
| AR | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 31 | 6 | 564 | 3 |
| FL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 42 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 960 | 5 |
| FL | 21 | 18 (98%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 32 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 1723 | 6 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| MD | 1 | 01 (60%) | 48 | 45 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 35 | 7 | 654 | 4 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| NY | 26 | 26 (89%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 3694 | 8 |
| OH | 10 | 10 (90%) | 54 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 26 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 1725 | 6 |
| PA | 12 | 18 (86%) | 60 | 63 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 24 | 3 | 38 | 8 | 3147 | 8 |
| TN | 7 | 07 (55%) | 42 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 450 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 1 | 01 (91%) | 35 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 17 | 1 | 101 | 1 |
| AR | 4 | 04 (86%) | 36 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 104 | 1 |
| FL | 6 | 06 (63%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 647 | 4 |
| GA | 14 | 14 (90%) | 35 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 29 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 454 | 3 |
| IL | 17 | 17 (71%) | 49 | 54 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 28 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 959 | 5 |
| MI | 8 | 05 (80%) | 48 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 24 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 832 | 4 |
| MI | 10 | 09 (66%) | 56 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 24 | 3 | 28 | 5 | 3884 | 8 |
| NC | 5 | 05 (83%) | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 24 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 335 | 2 |
| NC | 8 | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 24 | 3 | 365 | 2 | |
| NC | 10 | 10 (56%) | 41 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 367 | 2 |
| OH | 9 | 05 (50%) | 49 | 50 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 1059 | 5 |
| SC | 3 | 03 (95%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 26 | 3 | 25 | 3 | 245 | 2 |
| TN | 8 | 08 (82%) | 36 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 25 | 3 | 26 | 4 | 201 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AL | 3 | 03 (96%) | 39 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 195 | 1 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| FL | 18 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 525 | 3 | |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| MS | 1 | 01 (100%) | 33 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 186 | 1 |
| MS | 4 | 04 (100%) | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 301 | 2 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| SC | 7 | 07 (99%) | 40 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 21 | 2 | 312 | 2 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| NE | 2 | 02 (97%) | 58 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 28 | 4 | 40 | 8 | 2541 | 7 |
| TX | 2 | 48 | 36 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 1887 | 6 | |
| TX | 3 | 03 (76%) | 48 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 1833 | 6 |
| TX | 10 | 39 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 41 | 7 | 37 | 8 | 476 | 3 | |
| TX | 21 | 21 (76%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 42 | 9 | 783 | 4 |
| TX | 26 | 26 (74%) | 45 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 40 | 6 | 43 | 9 | 1462 | 6 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 23 | 08 (85%) | 46 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 806 | 4 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 4 | 04 (83%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 58 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 2417 | 7 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 11 | 11 (75%) | 44 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 52 | 8 | 22 | 2 | 892 | 4 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| TX | 27 | 27 (86%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 59 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 653 | 4 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 2 | 01 (66%) | 32 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 40 | 6 | 23 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| CA | 5 | 44 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 921 | 4 | |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| OK | 3 | 03 (74%) | 27 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 183 | 1 |
| OK | 4 | 04 (97%) | 34 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TX | 13 | 13 (83%) | 35 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 389 | 2 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 15 | 49 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 5 | 2056 | 7 | |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| TX | 5 | 05 (61%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 48 | 8 | 21 | 2 | 883 | 4 |
| TX | 14 | 14 (88%) | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 44 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1026 | 5 |
| TX | 17 | 17 (54%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 43 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 467 | 3 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 | |
| TX | 36 | 36 (73%) | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 47 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 755 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 15 | 49 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 5 | 2056 | 7 | |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| TX | 5 | 05 (61%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 48 | 8 | 21 | 2 | 883 | 4 |
| TX | 14 | 14 (88%) | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 44 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1026 | 5 |
| TX | 17 | 17 (54%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 43 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 467 | 3 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 | |
| TX | 36 | 36 (73%) | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 47 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 755 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 23 | 08 (85%) | 46 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 806 | 4 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NV | 4 | 04 (83%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 58 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 2417 | 7 |
| NY | 11 | 11 (87%) | 66 | 46 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 46 | 7 | 36 | 7 | 19506 | 10 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 11 | 11 (75%) | 44 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 52 | 8 | 22 | 2 | 892 | 4 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| TX | 27 | 27 (86%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 59 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 653 | 4 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 49 | 49 (90%) | 60 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 39 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 3607 | 8 |
| CO | 5 | 05 (100%) | 58 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 2267 | 7 |
| CO | 6 | 06 (84%) | 65 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 40 | 7 | 42 | 9 | 4651 | 8 |
| IL | 10 | 10 (77%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 38 | 6 | 45 | 9 | 1967 | 7 |
| IL | 11 | 59 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 33 | 5 | 44 | 9 | 2011 | 7 | |
| NE | 2 | 02 (97%) | 58 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 28 | 4 | 40 | 8 | 2541 | 7 |
| NY | 17 | 17 (72%) | 59 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 47 | 9 | 1852 | 6 |
| TX | 3 | 03 (76%) | 48 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 48 | 9 | 1833 | 6 |
| TX | 10 | 39 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 41 | 7 | 37 | 8 | 476 | 3 | |
| TX | 21 | 21 (76%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 42 | 9 | 783 | 4 |
| TX | 26 | 26 (74%) | 45 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 40 | 6 | 43 | 9 | 1462 | 6 |
| WA | 1 | 01 (65%) | 68 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 37 | 6 | 48 | 10 | 3514 | 8 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 7 | 03 (73%) | 50 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 1633 | 6 |
| CA | 9 | 09 (75%) | 57 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 67 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 3261 | 8 |
| CA | 27 | 25 (80%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 63 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 2692 | 7 |
| CA | 52 | 51 (69%) | 69 | 70 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 85 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 8603 | 10 |
| FL | 9 | 09 (71%) | 50 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 68 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 1843 | 6 |
| FL | 26 | 25 (78%) | 57 | 44 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 80 | 10 | 25 | 3 | 5177 | 9 |
| FL | 27 | 27 (82%) | 61 | 53 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 83 | 10 | 39 | 8 | 9355 | 10 |
| FL | 28 | 26 (92%) | 56 | 52 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 85 | 10 | 29 | 5 | 4714 | 9 |
| NJ | 9 | 09 (83%) | 66 | 62 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 59 | 9 | 32 | 6 | 10010 | 10 |
| NM | 2 | 02 (73%) | 51 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 67 | 9 | 22 | 2 | 364 | 2 |
| NM | 3 | 03 (81%) | 47 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 62 | 9 | 24 | 3 | 119 | 1 |
| TX | 15 | 15 (67%) | 46 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 82 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 964 | 5 |
| TX | 20 | 20 (84%) | 59 | 67 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 80 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 5224 | 9 |
| TX | 23 | 23 (79%) | 41 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 69 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 324 | 2 |
| TX | 28 | 28 (62%) | 50 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 81 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 1424 | 5 |
| TX | 35 | 35 (66%) | 55 | 73 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 70 | 9 | 27 | 4 | 2657 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 7 | 07 (62%) | 47 | 46 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 1877 | 6 |
| FL | 11 | 42 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 985 | 5 | |
| FL | 15 | 49 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 5 | 2056 | 7 | |
| FL | 16 | 16 (80%) | 47 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 1969 | 7 |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| NJ | 1 | 01 (95%) | 54 | 63 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 32 | 6 | 3026 | 7 |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| NY | 18 | 18 (70%) | 54 | 52 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 34 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 836 | 4 |
| TX | 5 | 05 (61%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 48 | 8 | 21 | 2 | 883 | 4 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 14 | 14 (88%) | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 44 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1026 | 5 |
| TX | 17 | 17 (54%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 43 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 467 | 3 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 | |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| TX | 36 | 36 (73%) | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 47 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 755 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 23 | 08 (85%) | 46 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 806 | 4 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 4 | 04 (83%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 58 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 2417 | 7 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 11 | 11 (75%) | 44 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 52 | 8 | 22 | 2 | 892 | 4 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| TX | 27 | 27 (86%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 59 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 653 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 4 | 09 (69%) | 55 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 41 | 7 | 35 | 7 | 5464 | 9 |
| CA | 4 | 05 (55%) | 52 | 67 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 45 | 7 | 34 | 7 | 1752 | 6 |
| CA | 48 | 50 (64%) | 52 | 41 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 43 | 7 | 31 | 6 | 1818 | 6 |
| IL | 8 | 08 (66%) | 62 | 57 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 42 | 7 | 38 | 8 | 3634 | 8 |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| MT | 1 | 00 (100%) | 43 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 128 | 1 |
| NE | 1 | 01 (89%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 1017 | 5 |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| OR | 6 | 05 (58%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 34 | 6 | 1910 | 6 |
| RI | 1 | 01 (99%) | 66 | 66 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 35 | 7 | 3148 | 8 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| TX | 12 | 12 (92%) | 47 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 41 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 2001 | 7 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 | |
| TX | 31 | 31 (79%) | 41 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 791 | 4 |
| UT | 4 | 04 (83%) | 45 | 30 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 2218 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 15 | 49 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 5 | 2056 | 7 | |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| TX | 5 | 05 (61%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 48 | 8 | 21 | 2 | 883 | 4 |
| TX | 14 | 14 (88%) | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 44 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1026 | 5 |
| TX | 17 | 17 (54%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 43 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 467 | 3 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 | |
| TX | 36 | 36 (73%) | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 47 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 755 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 5 | 05 (78%) | 49 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 30 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 3137 | 8 |
| MT | 1 | 00 (100%) | 43 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 128 | 1 |
| MT | 2 | 00 (100%) | 42 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 83 | 1 |
| NE | 1 | 01 (89%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 19 | 2 | 34 | 7 | 1017 | 5 |
| OR | 6 | 05 (58%) | 58 | 55 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 29 | 4 | 34 | 6 | 1910 | 6 |
| RI | 2 | 02 (98%) | 56 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 23 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1529 | 6 |
| TX | 4 | 04 (55%) | 42 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 39 | 8 | 729 | 4 |
| UT | 4 | 04 (83%) | 45 | 30 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 2218 | 7 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | 15 | 49 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 45 | 7 | 31 | 5 | 2056 | 7 | |
| IL | 14 | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 31 | 6 | 1487 | 6 | |
| NY | 2 | 02 (73%) | 61 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 41 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3784 | 8 |
| TX | 5 | 05 (61%) | 43 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 48 | 8 | 21 | 2 | 883 | 4 |
| TX | 14 | 14 (88%) | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 44 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 1026 | 5 |
| TX | 17 | 17 (54%) | 40 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 43 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 467 | 3 |
| TX | 25 | 42 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 28 | 5 | 900 | 4 | |
| TX | 36 | 36 (73%) | 43 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 47 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 755 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 23 | 08 (85%) | 46 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 806 | 4 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NV | 4 | 04 (83%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 58 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 2417 | 7 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 11 | 11 (75%) | 44 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 52 | 8 | 22 | 2 | 892 | 4 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| TX | 27 | 27 (86%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 59 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 653 | 4 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 6 | 63 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 49 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 5118 | 9 | |
| CA | 20 | 23 (52%) | 48 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 47 | 7 | 27 | 4 | 1383 | 5 |
| CA | 23 | 08 (85%) | 46 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 806 | 4 |
| CA | 41 | 42 (71%) | 53 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 52 | 8 | 28 | 4 | 1963 | 6 |
| CO | 8 | 07 (52%) | 57 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 44 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 2473 | 7 |
| NV | 1 | 01 (52%) | 55 | 55 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 56 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 5600 | 9 |
| NV | 3 | 03 (64%) | 57 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 53 | 8 | 30 | 5 | 4907 | 9 |
| NV | 4 | 04 (83%) | 52 | 56 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 58 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 2417 | 7 |
| TX | 6 | 44 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 749 | 4 | |
| TX | 8 | 44 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 51 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 1160 | 5 | |
| TX | 11 | 11 (75%) | 44 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 52 | 8 | 22 | 2 | 892 | 4 |
| TX | 19 | 19 (93%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 46 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 393 | 2 |
| TX | 27 | 27 (86%) | 41 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 59 | 8 | 19 | 1 | 653 | 4 |
| WA | 4 | 04 (95%) | 46 | 40 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 43 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 498 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 3 | 04 (57%) | 44 | 46 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 38 | 8 | 688 | 4 |
| FL | 19 | 19 (98%) | 45 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 26 | 3 | 34 | 7 | 1884 | 6 |
| IN | 5 | 05 (75%) | 48 | 41 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 17 | 2 | 38 | 8 | 962 | 5 |
| ME | 1 | 01 (98%) | 49 | 57 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 9 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 403 | 3 |
| MI | 7 | 08 (62%) | 47 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 18 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 751 | 4 |
| NH | 1 | 01 (100%) | 51 | 45 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 11 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 709 | 4 |
| NH | 2 | 02 (98%) | 48 | 48 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 11 | 1 | 37 | 7 | 303 | 2 |
| NJ | 4 | 04 (62%) | 46 | 38 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 2141 | 7 |
| OR | 5 | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 19 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1172 | 5 | |
| UT | 1 | 01 (87%) | 40 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 35 | 7 | 1187 | 5 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 6 | 06 (92%) | 51 | 57 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 25 | 3 | 31 | 6 | 905 | 4 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| WI | 5 | 05 (85%) | 49 | 35 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 12 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 790 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR | 3 | 03 (94%) | 40 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 28 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 508 | 3 |
| AZ | 8 | 08 (67%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 5 | 31 | 6 | 3415 | 8 |
| CA | 5 | 44 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 37 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 921 | 4 | |
| CO | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 29 | 5 | 151 | 1 |
| KS | 4 | 04 (99%) | 45 | 39 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 636 | 3 |
| MI | 4 | 06 (65%) | 48 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 31 | 5 | 729 | 4 |
| MN | 6 | 06 (90%) | 47 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 599 | 3 |
| NV | 2 | 02 (98%) | 36 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 531 | 3 |
| OK | 3 | 03 (74%) | 27 | 28 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 21 | 1 | 183 | 1 |
| OK | 4 | 04 (97%) | 34 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 4 | 457 | 3 |
| TX | 13 | 13 (83%) | 35 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 38 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 389 | 2 |
| UT | 2 | 02 (87%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 27 | 4 | 30 | 5 | 889 | 4 |
| WA | 2 | 02 (70%) | 56 | 59 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 27 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 1296 | 5 |
| WA | 8 | 08 (76%) | 52 | 51 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 27 | 4 | 39 | 8 | 708 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 6 | 02 (69%) | 42 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 36 | 7 | 821 | 4 |
| CA | 2 | 02 (91%) | 45 | 74 | At-Risk (Moving away from D) | 32 | 5 | 41 | 8 | 742 | 4 |
| CO | 4 | 04 (66%) | 44 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 394 | 3 |
| CO | 7 | 07 (59%) | 52 | 54 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 23 | 3 | 44 | 9 | 1467 | 6 |
| CT | 5 | 05 (99%) | 54 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 33 | 5 | 37 | 7 | 1228 | 5 |
| IL | 6 | 64 | 54 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 25 | 3 | 43 | 9 | 4117 | 8 | |
| MA | 2 | 02 (87%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 26 | 4 | 43 | 9 | 1075 | 5 |
| MA | 3 | 03 (96%) | 62 | 58 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 36 | 6 | 38 | 8 | 1905 | 6 |
| MN | 2 | 02 (92%) | 53 | 53 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 21 | 3 | 41 | 8 | 1257 | 5 |
| NY | 1 | 01 (68%) | 56 | 48 | Toss-up (Highly Winnable by D) | 26 | 3 | 45 | 9 | 1989 | 7 |
| NY | 20 | 20 (88%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 24 | 3 | 40 | 8 | 1559 | 6 |
| OR | 1 | 01 (82%) | 61 | 69 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 45 | 9 | 2114 | 7 |
| OR | 3 | 03 (96%) | 67 | 74 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 38 | 8 | 3603 | 8 |
| PA | 4 | 04 (81%) | 52 | 60 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 21 | 3 | 46 | 9 | 1806 | 6 |
| UT | 3 | 03 (83%) | 40 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 39 | 8 | 1051 | 5 |
| WI | 2 | 02 (100%) | 51 | 71 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 18 | 2 | 44 | 9 | 793 | 4 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 1 | 01 (100%) | 43 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 393 | 3 |
| AR | 2 | 02 (97%) | 51 | 42 | Flippable (Strongly D-leaning) | 31 | 4 | 31 | 6 | 564 | 3 |
| FL | 2 | 02 (64%) | 41 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 378 | 2 |
| FL | 3 | 03 (55%) | 38 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 346 | 2 |
| GA | 3 | 03 (88%) | 37 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 332 | 2 |
| GA | 10 | 10 (71%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 342 | 2 |
| IL | 13 | 13 (54%) | 56 | 56 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 32 | 5 | 30 | 5 | 1359 | 5 |
| IN | 1 | 01 (97%) | 54 | 58 | Becoming At-Risk (More Balanced than Advertised) | 37 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 1514 | 6 |
| KY | 3 | 03 (100%) | 61 | 61 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 34 | 5 | 32 | 6 | 2979 | 7 |
| MS | 4 | 04 (100%) | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 32 | 5 | 22 | 2 | 301 | 2 |
| NC | 3 | 03 (77%) | 43 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 33 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 236 | 1 |
| NC | 7 | 07 (64%) | 46 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 35 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 403 | 3 |
| NY | 26 | 26 (89%) | 59 | 60 | Safe D (No near-term D risk) | 31 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 3694 | 8 |
| SC | 5 | 05 (95%) | 39 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 | 380 | 2 |
| TX | 1 | 01 (72%) | 37 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 36 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 242 | 2 |
| VA | 5 | 05 (66%) | 42 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 30 | 4 | 31 | 5 | 215 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 4 | 04 (94%) | 29 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 18 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 140 | 1 |
| FL | 12 | 12 (55%) | 37 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 22 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 994 | 5 |
| IN | 3 | 03 (96%) | 41 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 401 | 3 |
| KY | 2 | 02 (87%) | 36 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 269 | 2 |
| ME | 2 | 02 (94%) | 45 | 44 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 8 | 1 | 26 | 4 | 99 | 1 |
| MN | 8 | 08 (86%) | 35 | 47 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 106 | 1 |
| MO | 4 | 04 (77%) | 32 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 176 | 1 |
| MO | 6 | 06 (83%) | 32 | 33 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 185 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 03 (92%) | 33 | 24 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 48 | 1 |
| NY | 21 | 21 (68%) | 41 | 43 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 150 | 1 |
| NY | 24 | 41 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 253 | 2 | |
| OH | 5 | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 443 | 3 | |
| OH | 12 | 36 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 333 | 2 | |
| OH | 14 | 14 (61%) | 43 | 45 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 693 | 4 |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| OR | 2 | 02 (92%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 21 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 123 | 1 |
| TN | 3 | 03 (90%) | 38 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 461 | 3 |
| VA | 6 | 06 (75%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 26 | 3 | 400 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| KY | 5 | 05 (93%) | 30 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 6 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| VA | 9 | 09 (81%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 149 | 1 |
| WV | 1 | 03 (64%) | 30 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 151 | 1 |
| WV | 2 | 01 (67%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 22 | 2 | 239 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | 2 | 02 (96%) | 37 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 20 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 381 | 2 |
| MN | 1 | 01 (90%) | 37 | 48 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 214 | 1 |
| MO | 7 | 07 (99%) | 38 | 29 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 436 | 3 |
| PA | 8 | 08 (92%) | 41 | 51 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 22 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 715 | 4 |
| PA | 11 | 11 (97%) | 40 | 40 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 16 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 888 | 4 |
| WA | 3 | 03 (98%) | 50 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 22 | 3 | 27 | 4 | 851 | 4 |
| WA | 5 | 05 (97%) | 41 | 44 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 19 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 475 | 3 |
| WI | 6 | 06 (97%) | 46 | 42 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| WI | 8 | 08 (100%) | 45 | 43 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 13 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 433 | 3 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 2 | 01 (86%) | 49 | 47 | Toss-up (Down to the Wire) | 12 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 274 | 2 |
| IA | 4 | 04 (80%) | 46 | 37 | Becoming Flippable (More balanced than Advertised) | 15 | 2 | 25 | 3 | 189 | 1 |
| ID | 1 | 01 (100%) | 36 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 17 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 307 | 2 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 9 | 09 (70%) | 39 | 38 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 349 | 2 |
| KY | 4 | 04 (94%) | 38 | 36 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 440 | 3 |
| MI | 1 | 01 (86%) | 37 | 41 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 87 | 1 |
| MI | 2 | 37 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 147 | 1 | |
| MN | 7 | 07 (87%) | 35 | 37 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 77 | 1 |
| MO | 8 | 08 (84%) | 31 | 26 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 162 | 1 |
| OH | 2 | 02 (54%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 238 | 1 |
| OK | 2 | 02 (91%) | 25 | 27 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 35 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 96 | 1 |
| PA | 9 | 09 (65%) | 30 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 2 | 337 | 2 |
| PA | 13 | 13 (74%) | 30 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 279 | 2 |
| PA | 14 | 14 (76%) | 31 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 8 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 370 | 2 |
| PA | 15 | 15 (59%) | 27 | 34 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 177 | 1 |
| PA | 16 | 16 (90%) | 35 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 534 | 3 |
| WI | 3 | 03 (98%) | 41 | 50 | Toss-up (Highly vulnerable for D) | 9 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 195 | 1 |
| WI | 7 | 07 (98%) | 40 | 42 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 25 | 3 | 91 | 1 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 32 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 144 | 1 | |
| IN | 8 | 08 (95%) | 38 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 271 | 2 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| KY | 5 | 05 (93%) | 30 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 6 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| VA | 9 | 09 (81%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 149 | 1 |
| WV | 1 | 03 (64%) | 30 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 151 | 1 |
| WV | 2 | 01 (67%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 22 | 2 | 239 | 2 |
| State | District | Was | Demographic Model (Blue Ripple) | Historical Model (Dave's Redistricting) | BR Stance | %Non-White | NW Quantile | %Grad-White | GOW Quantile | Pop/SqMile | Density Quantile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL | 12 | 12 (53%) | 33 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 12 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 131 | 1 |
| KY | 1 | 01 (87%) | 34 | 35 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 14 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 142 | 1 |
| KY | 5 | 05 (93%) | 30 | 31 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 6 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| MI | 5 | 07 (65%) | 40 | 39 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 23 | 2 | 296 | 2 |
| TN | 1 | 01 (94%) | 30 | 23 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 290 | 2 |
| VA | 9 | 09 (81%) | 32 | 30 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 13 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 149 | 1 |
| WV | 1 | 03 (64%) | 30 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 9 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 151 | 1 |
| WV | 2 | 01 (67%) | 34 | 32 | Safe R (No near-term D hope) | 10 | 1 | 22 | 2 | 239 | 2 |
Want to read more from Blue Ripple? Visit our website, sign up for email updates, and follow us on Twitter and FaceBook. Folks interested in our data and modeling efforts should also check out our Github page.